Comparison Overview

Law Tigers

VS

Mase Seitz Briggs

Law Tigers

362 North 3rd Avenue, Phoenix, AZ, 85003, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Law Tigers is a professional association of motorcycle injury lawyers who help riders every day. Our association of motorcycle accident attorneys consists of a skilled group of personal injury lawyers whose mission is to support and promote the well being of motorcyclists. Dedicated to rider safety, awareness, and education, we are committed to the riding community.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 47
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Mase Seitz Briggs

2601 South Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida, 33133, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The seasoned attorneys at Mase Seitz Briggs have tried hundreds of civil and criminal cases, jury and non-jury alike. Our legal team focuses its practice on serious personal injury, commercial litigation, maritime, property and white collar criminal defense. We ensure that each client receives the highest level of personal service, professionalism and case preparation while maintaining the highest ethical standards and civility in the practice of law. We believe in what we do. We believe in redressing wrongs. No two clients and no two cases are ever exactly alike. That’s why our method for approaching each case is to consistently provide dedicated service and timely action. Every client receives the benefits of early case evaluation and top-level continuity. Our goal is, and always will be, to provide innovative and constructive resolution of our clients’ legal needs. Please visit our website for more information at www.maselaw.com.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/law-tigers.jpeg
Law Tigers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mase-lara-eversole-p-a-.jpeg
Mase Seitz Briggs
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Law Tigers
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mase Seitz Briggs
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Law Tigers in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mase Seitz Briggs in 2025.

Incident History — Law Tigers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Law Tigers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mase Seitz Briggs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mase Seitz Briggs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/law-tigers.jpeg
Law Tigers
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mase-lara-eversole-p-a-.jpeg
Mase Seitz Briggs
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Law Tigers company and Mase Seitz Briggs company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Mase Seitz Briggs company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Law Tigers company.

In the current year, Mase Seitz Briggs company and Law Tigers company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Mase Seitz Briggs company nor Law Tigers company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Mase Seitz Briggs company nor Law Tigers company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Mase Seitz Briggs company nor Law Tigers company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Law Tigers company nor Mase Seitz Briggs company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Law Tigers nor Mase Seitz Briggs holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Law Tigers company nor Mase Seitz Briggs company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Law Tigers company employs more people globally than Mase Seitz Briggs company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Law Tigers nor Mase Seitz Briggs holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Law Tigers nor Mase Seitz Briggs holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Law Tigers nor Mase Seitz Briggs holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Law Tigers nor Mase Seitz Briggs holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Law Tigers nor Mase Seitz Briggs holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Law Tigers nor Mase Seitz Briggs holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X