Comparison Overview

Schuerger Law Group

VS

The Community Tax Law Project

Schuerger Law Group

1001 Kingsmill Pkwy, Columbus, 43229, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

EXPERIENCE Highly trained, engaged and satisfied collectors who create satisfied customeprs Average of 12 years of collections and legal experience per person Experience with General State Receivables, various Tax matters, Local Debt, University and College tuition, loans and receivables, University Medical, Workers’ Compensation, Probate, Subrogation, Bankruptcy, Foreclosures and International recovery. TOOLS & RESOURCES Leading customized collections software Powerful skip-tracing tools Exceptional and compliant processes for identifying and locating hard to find and highly mobile debtors Proprietary scoring software Secure online payment website receiving direct payments Advanced tracking and compliance software RESULTS Earn rates that exceed industry standards! Emphasize setting realistic and sustainable payment plans that drive month-over-month increases in recoveries Pursue legal remedies to reinforce when non-legal collection practices are not successful CUSTOMER SERVICE All persons are treated respectfully and considerately We understand the delicate relationship between public sector clients and their taxpaying constituents We are committed to protecting and promoting our client’s reputations for accountability, highly ethical collection practices and customer service Competent staffing and management of your accounts COMPLIANCE Monthly trainings: FDCPA, HIPAA, FERPA, CFPB, TCPA and IRS-1075 guidelines “Inspect what we Expect” philosophy of call monitoring supports our commitment to total compliance and zero tolerance for complaints Data Security and Privacy Protections NIST and FISMA Certification – the highest federal standards! IRS-1075 compliant Multi-layer administrative, technical and physical safeguards in place to mitigate improper disclosure of private information

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 53
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Community Tax Law Project

5206 Markel Road, Richmond, Virginia, 23230, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The Community Tax Law Project (CTLP) ensures the fairness and integrity of the tax system by providing free legal representation to low-income Virginia taxpayers in tax disputes, educating taxpayers about their rights and responsibilities, and advocating for issues that impact low-income taxpayers. CTLP’s services strengthen the financial stability of working families and help to ensure that all taxpayers, regardless of income level, receive fair and equal treatment in tax disputes. CTLP accomplishes its mission through the generous assistance of a panel of approximately 100 pro bono volunteers as well as in-house legal staff who provide representation and education to lower income families. CTLP provides continuing education and training to pro bono panel members and other tax professionals. The clinic assists approximately 1,000 taxpayers and families each year. To qualify for services, a taxpayer’s income must be at or below 250% of the federal poverty guidelines. CTLP receives referrals from community organizations, legal aid societies, departments of social services, churches, and other service providers to the “working poor.” CTLP staff frequently partner with these groups to provide educational programs to staff and their clients. CTLP accepts cases at all stages of tax controversy, including examinations, appeals, refund claims, collections and negotiation of payment plans, and representation in administrative hearings and before the United States Tax Court. Education and outreach programs currently focus on immigrant taxpayers, participants in welfare-to-work programs, victims of domestic violence, elderly and disabled taxpayers, self-employed taxpayers, and U.S. military veterans.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/law-offices-of-robert-a-schuerger-co-lpa.jpeg
Schuerger Law Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-community-tax-law-project.jpeg
The Community Tax Law Project
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Schuerger Law Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Community Tax Law Project
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Schuerger Law Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Community Tax Law Project in 2025.

Incident History — Schuerger Law Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Schuerger Law Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Community Tax Law Project (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Community Tax Law Project cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/law-offices-of-robert-a-schuerger-co-lpa.jpeg
Schuerger Law Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-community-tax-law-project.jpeg
The Community Tax Law Project
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Schuerger Law Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Community Tax Law Project company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Community Tax Law Project company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Schuerger Law Group company.

In the current year, The Community Tax Law Project company and Schuerger Law Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Community Tax Law Project company nor Schuerger Law Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Community Tax Law Project company nor Schuerger Law Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Community Tax Law Project company nor Schuerger Law Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Schuerger Law Group company nor The Community Tax Law Project company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Schuerger Law Group nor The Community Tax Law Project holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Schuerger Law Group company nor The Community Tax Law Project company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Schuerger Law Group company employs more people globally than The Community Tax Law Project company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Schuerger Law Group nor The Community Tax Law Project holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Schuerger Law Group nor The Community Tax Law Project holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Schuerger Law Group nor The Community Tax Law Project holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Schuerger Law Group nor The Community Tax Law Project holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Schuerger Law Group nor The Community Tax Law Project holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Schuerger Law Group nor The Community Tax Law Project holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X