Comparison Overview

Dubin Law Group

VS

Lexicon

Dubin Law Group

115 N 85th Street, Seattle, WA, 98103, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Welcome to the Law Office of Matthew D. Dubin. We hope this is the start of a fruitful relationship. It is important to me and my staff that clients feel their needs are understood and honored. We work for you, and will go to any lengths on your behalf in aggressively pursuing your goals. Helping clients pursue compensation in car accident and other personal injury cases has been the exclusive focus of my practice since 1995. After attending Yale University, I received my law degree here in Seattle at the University of Washington Law School. I established this firm in 1998 as a sole practitioner in order to serve clients in a one-on-one relationship. You deal with me personally, and you can always reach me when you need to talk to your lawyer. Based in Seattle, Washington, our firm handles a full spectrum of personal injury claims for clients in Bellevue, Everett, Tacoma, and all surrounding communities in King, Snohomish, and Pierce counties. If you were injured in a motor vehicle accident, a slip and fall, or by medical or dental malpractice, we are happy to evaluate your potential claim in a free consultation.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 54
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Lexicon

13723 Riverport Dr, Suite 103, Maryland Heights, Missouri, US, 63043
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Lexicon is a legal services and technology provider with deep expertise in the legal industry. We provide a world-class practice management software suite, enabling attorneys to maximize productive use of their time when working cases. With expertise in marketing for law firms, revenue optimization, billing and collections, support services, and more, Lexicon is your trusted partner for all legal practice needs. Lexicon began as the practice management group behind the world’s largest family law firm. Operating since 2008 with the mission of liberating law firms to do what they do best, Lexicon is enabled by technology and world-class legal industry expertise.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 191
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/law-offices-of-matthew-d-dubin.jpeg
Dubin Law Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lexiconlegalservices.jpeg
Lexicon
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Dubin Law Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lexicon
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dubin Law Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lexicon in 2025.

Incident History — Dubin Law Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dubin Law Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lexicon (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lexicon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/law-offices-of-matthew-d-dubin.jpeg
Dubin Law Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lexiconlegalservices.jpeg
Lexicon
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Dubin Law Group company and Lexicon company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Lexicon company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Dubin Law Group company.

In the current year, Lexicon company and Dubin Law Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lexicon company nor Dubin Law Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lexicon company nor Dubin Law Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lexicon company nor Dubin Law Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Dubin Law Group company nor Lexicon company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Dubin Law Group nor Lexicon holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Dubin Law Group company nor Lexicon company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lexicon company employs more people globally than Dubin Law Group company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Dubin Law Group nor Lexicon holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Dubin Law Group nor Lexicon holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Dubin Law Group nor Lexicon holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Dubin Law Group nor Lexicon holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Dubin Law Group nor Lexicon holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Dubin Law Group nor Lexicon holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X