Comparison Overview

Law Offices of Khani & Auerbach

VS

Banjoko Law

Law Offices of Khani & Auerbach

2338 Hollywood Blvd., Hollywood, FL, 33020, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

WELCOME TO KHANI & AUERBACH Khani & Auerbach is a general practice law firm serving clients throughout the State of Florida. Attorneys, Jay E. Auerbach and Khila L. Khani, take pride in providing clients with quality representation and personalized service in a professional and cost-efficient manner. Each client is treated professionally and with integrity. Clients are assured that they will be provided with service on an individual basis and with the utmost consideration. Practice Areas include: •Residential Real Estate •Commercial Real Estate •Estate Planning •Probate/Trust Administration •Business Law •Landlord Tenant •Personal Injury •Commercial Litigation •Criminal Law The combination of the long-term perspective, focused practice and boutique setting allows us to optimally serve our clients. We look forward to counseling and assisting you with all your legal needs.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Banjoko Law

2 Seymour Avenue, Kingston 6, JM
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Banjoko Law is a full-service international law partnership concentrating on civil transactions and litigation. We are structured to provide service in the law of Jamaica in USA, Canada and England through affilates and virtual presence. Thus, we truly provide LEGALl SOLUTIONS ACROSS BORDERS(tm)! Affordability and practicality are important to us. Being pro-active is not an option in the operations of Banjoko McGlashan Wieslaw because of the high speed with which transactions occur in the legal market place. Bottom-liine, we will provide practical, affordable lLEGAL SOLUTIONS ACROSS BORDERS(tm).

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/law-offices-of-khani-&-auerbach.jpeg
Law Offices of Khani & Auerbach
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Banjoko Law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Law Offices of Khani & Auerbach
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Banjoko Law
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Law Offices of Khani & Auerbach in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Banjoko Law in 2025.

Incident History — Law Offices of Khani & Auerbach (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Law Offices of Khani & Auerbach cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Banjoko Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Banjoko Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/law-offices-of-khani-&-auerbach.jpeg
Law Offices of Khani & Auerbach
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Banjoko Law
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Law Offices of Khani & Auerbach company and Banjoko Law company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Banjoko Law company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Law Offices of Khani & Auerbach company.

In the current year, Banjoko Law company and Law Offices of Khani & Auerbach company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Banjoko Law company nor Law Offices of Khani & Auerbach company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Banjoko Law company nor Law Offices of Khani & Auerbach company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Banjoko Law company nor Law Offices of Khani & Auerbach company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Law Offices of Khani & Auerbach company nor Banjoko Law company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Law Offices of Khani & Auerbach nor Banjoko Law holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Law Offices of Khani & Auerbach company nor Banjoko Law company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Law Offices of Khani & Auerbach company employs more people globally than Banjoko Law company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Law Offices of Khani & Auerbach nor Banjoko Law holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Law Offices of Khani & Auerbach nor Banjoko Law holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Law Offices of Khani & Auerbach nor Banjoko Law holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Law Offices of Khani & Auerbach nor Banjoko Law holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Law Offices of Khani & Auerbach nor Banjoko Law holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Law Offices of Khani & Auerbach nor Banjoko Law holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X