Comparison Overview

Law Offices of John S. Cossum

VS

Pittman Agner

Law Offices of John S. Cossum

1412B Stonehollow Dr., Kingwood, 77339, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Attorney in private practice, specializing in criminal defense, family law, and commercial litigation, licensed to practice in the State of Texas and various Federal Courts. Criminal practice is focused on major felony offenses including drug offenses, computer crimes, violent felonies and major fraud, both as defense counsel and in assisting with the presentation of cases on behalf of clients to prosecuting authorities. Family practice includes Divorce, Protective Orders, Modification and Enforcement. Commercial litigation practice includes diverse areas of experience, including commercial tort and contract disputes.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Pittman Agner

112 N. William St., Goldsboro, North Carolina, 27530, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Strickland Agner Pittman know the problems that are caused when dealing with a legal issue. We have decades of combined experience working for clients and handling claims throughout Wayne County and the surrounding areas of North Carolina. During a free consultation with us, you can see how we put our clients first. We will take the time to understand your case, review your rights and options with you, and discuss strategy for moving forward. Above all, we know how confusing this time may be for you. We are available to answer your questions and address any concerns you have about your case. We will stand by your side and keep you informed every step of the way. We handle cases in a wide range of practice areas including, personal injury, workers’ compensation, family law, Social Security benefits, criminal defense, and more. When our clients choose us, our goal is to be an advocate in their corner. When it comes to medical bills, insurance companies, lost income, and your rights, we will fight for you.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Law Offices of John S. Cossum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/strickland-agner-associates.jpeg
Pittman Agner
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Law Offices of John S. Cossum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Pittman Agner
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Law Offices of John S. Cossum in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pittman Agner in 2025.

Incident History — Law Offices of John S. Cossum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Law Offices of John S. Cossum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Pittman Agner (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pittman Agner cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Law Offices of John S. Cossum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/strickland-agner-associates.jpeg
Pittman Agner
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Law Offices of John S. Cossum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Pittman Agner company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Pittman Agner company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Law Offices of John S. Cossum company.

In the current year, Pittman Agner company and Law Offices of John S. Cossum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Pittman Agner company nor Law Offices of John S. Cossum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Pittman Agner company nor Law Offices of John S. Cossum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Pittman Agner company nor Law Offices of John S. Cossum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Law Offices of John S. Cossum company nor Pittman Agner company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Law Offices of John S. Cossum nor Pittman Agner holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Law Offices of John S. Cossum company nor Pittman Agner company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Pittman Agner company employs more people globally than Law Offices of John S. Cossum company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Law Offices of John S. Cossum nor Pittman Agner holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Law Offices of John S. Cossum nor Pittman Agner holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Law Offices of John S. Cossum nor Pittman Agner holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Law Offices of John S. Cossum nor Pittman Agner holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Law Offices of John S. Cossum nor Pittman Agner holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Law Offices of John S. Cossum nor Pittman Agner holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X