Comparison Overview

Law in Order

VS

Crossan Intellectual Property Law, LLC

Law in Order

Last Update: 2025-11-30
Between 700 and 749

Law in Order in New Zealand is a developer and provider of litigation and compliance manuals. Law in Order also trains prosecutors and compliance officers. It is an approved trainer and assessor of all levels of the New Zealand National Compliance Qualifications for compliance officers. Law in Order works with law firms, prosecuting agencies and compliance organisations to develop tailored on-line manuals and train their staff. The manuals are totally secure, available on-line and updated as the law and procedures change. Training is coordinated with the material in the manuals, or delivered on an "as needed"​ basis. A generic on-line Compliance Manual and a generic on-line Prosecution Manual are available to any users for a nominal monthly fee. Both are kept constantly up to date. For more information about training or manuals, contact David Colbert on [email protected] or +64 21 981 553.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Crossan Intellectual Property Law, LLC

875 N Michigan Ave., #3216, Chicago, IL, 60611-1960, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

For over 35 years now John R. Crossan has helped businesses, institutions, and individuals thrive and compete successfully with services provided by his specialized practice of Intellectual Property Law - shortened as IP Law. John R. Crossan has, with his clients, obtained and enforced or protected against patents, trademarks, copyrights, and trade secrets, and John R. Crossan has helped clients understand and use employment covenants and IP-related antitrust law. He has done this through litigation in Federal and state courts and other dispute resolution forums, here and abroad, through preparing and prosecuting applications, by negotiations and licensing, and through counseling of clients of all sizes.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/law-in-order_2.jpeg
Law in Order
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/crossan-ip-law-llc.jpeg
Crossan Intellectual Property Law, LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Law in Order
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Crossan Intellectual Property Law, LLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Law in Order in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Crossan Intellectual Property Law, LLC in 2025.

Incident History — Law in Order (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Law in Order cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Crossan Intellectual Property Law, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Crossan Intellectual Property Law, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/law-in-order_2.jpeg
Law in Order
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2020
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/crossan-ip-law-llc.jpeg
Crossan Intellectual Property Law, LLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Crossan Intellectual Property Law, LLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Law in Order company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Law in Order company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Crossan Intellectual Property Law, LLC company has not reported any.

In the current year, Crossan Intellectual Property Law, LLC company and Law in Order company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Law in Order company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Crossan Intellectual Property Law, LLC company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Crossan Intellectual Property Law, LLC company nor Law in Order company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Crossan Intellectual Property Law, LLC company nor Law in Order company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Law in Order company nor Crossan Intellectual Property Law, LLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Law in Order nor Crossan Intellectual Property Law, LLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Law in Order company nor Crossan Intellectual Property Law, LLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Law in Order company employs more people globally than Crossan Intellectual Property Law, LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Law in Order nor Crossan Intellectual Property Law, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Law in Order nor Crossan Intellectual Property Law, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Law in Order nor Crossan Intellectual Property Law, LLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Law in Order nor Crossan Intellectual Property Law, LLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Law in Order nor Crossan Intellectual Property Law, LLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Law in Order nor Crossan Intellectual Property Law, LLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X