Comparison Overview

Pine River Library

VS

St. Mary's County Library

Pine River Library

395 Bayfield Center Drive, Bayfield, 81122, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Formed in 1934, Bayfield's only library focuses on connecting people to possibilities. From checking out books and movies to attending free classes and workshops, the library is the "living room" of the Bayfield community. Open seven days a week, the Pine River Library is here to help you connect to your possibilities.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

St. Mary's County Library

23250 Hollywood Road, Leonardtown, MD, US, 20650
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

St. Mary’s County Library provides library resources and services necessary to meet the educational, recreational, and informational needs of the public in St. Mary's County, Maryland. It is our goal to to promote the communications of ideas, an enlightened citizenship, and enriched personal lives. Our library system is a proud member of the Southern Maryland Regional Library Association. Our branches are located in Charlotte Hall, Leonardtown, and Lexington Park.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 64
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lavenia-mccoy-public-library.jpeg
Pine River Library
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stmalib.jpeg
St. Mary's County Library
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pine River Library
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
St. Mary's County Library
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pine River Library in 2025.

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for St. Mary's County Library in 2025.

Incident History — Pine River Library (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pine River Library cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — St. Mary's County Library (X = Date, Y = Severity)

St. Mary's County Library cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lavenia-mccoy-public-library.jpeg
Pine River Library
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stmalib.jpeg
St. Mary's County Library
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Pine River Library company and St. Mary's County Library company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, St. Mary's County Library company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Pine River Library company.

In the current year, St. Mary's County Library company and Pine River Library company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither St. Mary's County Library company nor Pine River Library company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither St. Mary's County Library company nor Pine River Library company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither St. Mary's County Library company nor Pine River Library company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pine River Library company nor St. Mary's County Library company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pine River Library nor St. Mary's County Library holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Pine River Library company nor St. Mary's County Library company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

St. Mary's County Library company employs more people globally than Pine River Library company, reflecting its scale as a Libraries.

Neither Pine River Library nor St. Mary's County Library holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pine River Library nor St. Mary's County Library holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pine River Library nor St. Mary's County Library holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pine River Library nor St. Mary's County Library holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pine River Library nor St. Mary's County Library holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pine River Library nor St. Mary's County Library holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H