Comparison Overview

Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center

VS

The Children's Museum

Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center

100 Bancroft Street, Omaha, Nebraska, 68108, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01

Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center, is an urban oasis of beauty and tranquility. It is a hidden sanctuary in the heart of the city. This living plant museum is conveniently located on a 100-acre site of natural woods and rolling terraces just west of the banks of the Missouri River.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 52
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Children's Museum

950 Troutbrook Drive, None, West Hartford, CT, US, 06119
Last Update: 2025-11-27

The Children’s Museum in West Hartford and Roaring Brook Nature Center in Canton are Connecticut’s premiere destinations for exploration and education. The Children's Museum Wildlife Sanctuary is home to more than 100 live rescued animals. Travelers Science Dome is CT's largest digital full dome planetarium, and fun with science and nature for the family or school group, scout group, and more. Great place for a birthday party for your favorite child. Free onsite parking, walking distance to West Hartford Center and Blue Back Square. Admission: $14.75 ages 13 and up, $13.75 for children age 2-12 and senior age 63+; free for under age 2. Join our email list for special offers and discounts! Open Tuesday - Saturday 9:00am-4:00pm, Sunday 11:00am-4:00pm. Open Mondays during the summer and on local school holidays.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 72
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lauritzen-gardens-omaha's-botanical-center.jpeg
Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-children's-museum.jpeg
The Children's Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Children's Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Children's Museum in 2025.

Incident History — Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Children's Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Children's Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lauritzen-gardens-omaha's-botanical-center.jpeg
Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-children's-museum.jpeg
The Children's Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Children's Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Children's Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center company.

In the current year, The Children's Museum company and Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Children's Museum company nor Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Children's Museum company nor Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Children's Museum company nor Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center company nor The Children's Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center nor The Children's Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center company nor The Children's Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Children's Museum company employs more people globally than Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center nor The Children's Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center nor The Children's Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center nor The Children's Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center nor The Children's Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center nor The Children's Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center nor The Children's Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X