Comparison Overview

Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center

VS

Museo de Antioquia

Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center

100 Bancroft Street, Omaha, Nebraska, 68108, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.lauritzengardens.org

Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center, is an urban oasis of beauty and tranquility. It is a hidden sanctuary in the heart of the city. This living plant museum is conveniently located on a 100-acre site of natural woods and rolling terraces just west of the banks of the Missouri River.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 52
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Museo de Antioquia

Carrera 52 N. 52-43, Medellín, 00000, CO
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.museodeantioquia.org.co

El Museo de Antioquia es el museo más importante de Medellín, y uno de los más conocidos de Colombia. Fue el primero fundado en el departamento de Antioquia, el segundo en el país. Sus colecciones reposan en pleno centro de Medellín, frente a la plaza Botero, cerca de la Estación Parque Berrío del metro. El Museo de Antioquia, es reconocido por ser la casa de la Donación Botero, Maestro Fernando Botero, aunque posee otras obras, de incalculable valor histórico y artístico.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 104
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lauritzen-gardens-omaha's-botanical-center.jpeg
Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museo-de-antioquia.jpeg
Museo de Antioquia
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Museo de Antioquia
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Museo de Antioquia in 2026.

Incident History — Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Museo de Antioquia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Museo de Antioquia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lauritzen-gardens-omaha's-botanical-center.jpeg
Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museo-de-antioquia.jpeg
Museo de Antioquia
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center company and Museo de Antioquia company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Museo de Antioquia company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center company.

In the current year, Museo de Antioquia company and Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Museo de Antioquia company nor Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Museo de Antioquia company nor Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Museo de Antioquia company nor Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center company nor Museo de Antioquia company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center nor Museo de Antioquia holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center company nor Museo de Antioquia company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Museo de Antioquia company employs more people globally than Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center nor Museo de Antioquia holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center nor Museo de Antioquia holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center nor Museo de Antioquia holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center nor Museo de Antioquia holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center nor Museo de Antioquia holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center nor Museo de Antioquia holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References