Comparison Overview

Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center

VS

Palo Alto Art Center Foundation

Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center

100 Bancroft Street, Omaha, Nebraska, 68108, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01

Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center, is an urban oasis of beauty and tranquility. It is a hidden sanctuary in the heart of the city. This living plant museum is conveniently located on a 100-acre site of natural woods and rolling terraces just west of the banks of the Missouri River.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 52
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Palo Alto Art Center Foundation

1313 Newell Road, Palo Alto, CA, 94393, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Palo Alto Art Center Foundation expands the reach and impact of the Palo Alto Art Center through fundraising and advocacy. The Foundation was founded in 1973 and is a nonprofit 501 (c) 3 nonprofit organization that provides support to the Palo Alto Art Center in a public/private partnership. With the support of the Foundation, the Art Center serves more than 100,000 people every year through a diverse range of programs that benefit all ages. Our Foundation supporters enjoy events, exhibition previews, and discounts on classes, camps, and more. Visit www.paaf.org

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 37
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lauritzen-gardens-omaha's-botanical-center.jpeg
Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/palo-alto-art-center-foundation.jpeg
Palo Alto Art Center Foundation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Palo Alto Art Center Foundation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Palo Alto Art Center Foundation in 2025.

Incident History — Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Palo Alto Art Center Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Palo Alto Art Center Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lauritzen-gardens-omaha's-botanical-center.jpeg
Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/palo-alto-art-center-foundation.jpeg
Palo Alto Art Center Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center company and Palo Alto Art Center Foundation company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Palo Alto Art Center Foundation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center company.

In the current year, Palo Alto Art Center Foundation company and Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Palo Alto Art Center Foundation company nor Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Palo Alto Art Center Foundation company nor Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Palo Alto Art Center Foundation company nor Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center company nor Palo Alto Art Center Foundation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center nor Palo Alto Art Center Foundation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center company nor Palo Alto Art Center Foundation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center company employs more people globally than Palo Alto Art Center Foundation company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center nor Palo Alto Art Center Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center nor Palo Alto Art Center Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center nor Palo Alto Art Center Foundation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center nor Palo Alto Art Center Foundation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center nor Palo Alto Art Center Foundation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center nor Palo Alto Art Center Foundation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X