Comparison Overview

Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center

VS

Old World Wisconsin Foundation

Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center

100 Bancroft Street, Omaha, Nebraska, 68108, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.lauritzengardens.org

Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center, is an urban oasis of beauty and tranquility. It is a hidden sanctuary in the heart of the city. This living plant museum is conveniently located on a 100-acre site of natural woods and rolling terraces just west of the banks of the Missouri River.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 52
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Old World Wisconsin Foundation

undefined, P.O. Box 347 Elkhorn, WI, 53121, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799
https://oldworldfoundation.org/

Old World Wisconsin Foundation, also known as Old World Foundation, is an independent 501(c)(3) non-profit organization founded in 1984 to support projects and programs at Old World Wisconsin, owned and operated by the Wisconsin Historical Society. Old World Foundation gratefully accepts donations from individuals, foundations, and corporations to provide additional support for Old World Wisconsin. Our foundation applies for grants, hosts fundraisers, and oversees endowment funds to benefit this treasured historic site. We are guided by a group of dedicated trustees who donate their time, talent, and treasure. Old World Wisconsin is a 600-acre outdoor living history attraction with over 100 animals (many are heritage breeds in danger of becoming extinct), 20 heirloom gardens, 60+ historic buildings and experienced facilitators and volunteers who bring history to life for over 50,000 guests each year. We would be honored if you would join us in celebrating the history of the Midwest by supporting Old World Wisconsin through Old World Foundation!

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lauritzen-gardens-omaha's-botanical-center.jpeg
Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/old-world-wisconsin-foundation.jpeg
Old World Wisconsin Foundation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Old World Wisconsin Foundation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Old World Wisconsin Foundation in 2025.

Incident History — Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Old World Wisconsin Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Old World Wisconsin Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lauritzen-gardens-omaha's-botanical-center.jpeg
Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/old-world-wisconsin-foundation.jpeg
Old World Wisconsin Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center company and Old World Wisconsin Foundation company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Old World Wisconsin Foundation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center company.

In the current year, Old World Wisconsin Foundation company and Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Old World Wisconsin Foundation company nor Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Old World Wisconsin Foundation company nor Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Old World Wisconsin Foundation company nor Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center company nor Old World Wisconsin Foundation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center nor Old World Wisconsin Foundation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center company nor Old World Wisconsin Foundation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center company employs more people globally than Old World Wisconsin Foundation company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center nor Old World Wisconsin Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center nor Old World Wisconsin Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center nor Old World Wisconsin Foundation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center nor Old World Wisconsin Foundation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center nor Old World Wisconsin Foundation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center nor Old World Wisconsin Foundation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References