Comparison Overview

Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center

VS

Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture)

Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center

100 Bancroft Street, Omaha, Nebraska, 68108, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.lauritzengardens.org

Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center, is an urban oasis of beauty and tranquility. It is a hidden sanctuary in the heart of the city. This living plant museum is conveniently located on a 100-acre site of natural woods and rolling terraces just west of the banks of the Missouri River.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 52
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture)

1048 Washington Street, Cape May, NJ, 08204, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799
http://www.capemaymac.org

Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) is a multi-faceted non-profit organization that promotes the restoration, interpretation and cultural enrichment of greater Cape May for its residents and visitors. With a membership of more than 3,200, a paid staff of 160 and some 300 volunteers, Cape May MAC offers a year-round calendar of tours and special events that serves more than 300,000 people each year. Through its sponsorship of cultural and heritage tourism, Cape May MAC has helped transform Cape May from a "summer only"​ beach resort to the country's leading Victorian theme destination. Cape May MAC was formed in September, 1970 by a small group of Cape May citizens with the express purpose of rescuing the 1879 Emlen Physick Estate, an 18 room mansion, from demolition. Their campaign to preserve not only the Physick Estate but Victorian architectural treasures throughout Cape May has played a vital role in revitalizing the nation's oldest seaside resort

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 39
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lauritzen-gardens-omaha's-botanical-center.jpeg
Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mid-atlantic-center-for-the-arts-&-humanities.jpeg
Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture)
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) in 2025.

Incident History — Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lauritzen-gardens-omaha's-botanical-center.jpeg
Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mid-atlantic-center-for-the-arts-&-humanities.jpeg
Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center company.

In the current year, Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) company and Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) company nor Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) company nor Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) company nor Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center company nor Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center nor Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center company nor Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center company employs more people globally than Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center nor Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center nor Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center nor Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center nor Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center nor Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lauritzen Gardens, Omaha's Botanical Center nor Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References