Comparison Overview

Laurier Economics Club

VS

CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia

Laurier Economics Club

75 University Ave W, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L3C5, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-01

Laurier’s only economics-focused student organization. https://linktr.ee/lauriereconclub What we do: Laurier Economics Club (LEC) promotes meaningful connections among Canadian leaders and Laurier students. The purpose of this organization is to stimulate discussion and interest in current economic issues. We offer members an opportunity to further extend their economics knowledge by taking part in activities hosted by LEC. Our "Why": Our purpose is to help students learn more about economics as a study, as a career path and its applications to the world Our Vision: To be the center of everything economics-related - the economics hub - for all students and faculty at Laurier. In essence, our vision is to make LEC at the heart of the Economics experience at Laurier. Our Mission: To highlight the opportunities available in the economics field and to help nurture the curiosity and interests of students in the study of economics. For more information about LEC visit us: Facebook: Facebook.com/LaurierEconClub/ Twitter: Twitter.com/lauriereconclub Email: [email protected] Website: https://www.lauriereconomicsclub.com/

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia

Level 3, 271 Spring Street , Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

CEDA (the Committee for Economic Development of Australia) is an independent, non-profit organisation providing thought leadership and policy perspectives on the economic and social issues affecting Australia. We conduct independent research, convene conversations nationwide and work with our members across government, academia and business, seeking to achieve long-term prosperity for all Australians. CEDA was founded in 1960 by Sir Douglas Copland.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 165
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/laurier-economics-club.jpeg
Laurier Economics Club
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ceda---committee-for-economic-development-of-australia.jpeg
CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Laurier Economics Club
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Laurier Economics Club in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia in 2025.

Incident History — Laurier Economics Club (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Laurier Economics Club cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/laurier-economics-club.jpeg
Laurier Economics Club
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ceda---committee-for-economic-development-of-australia.jpeg
CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Laurier Economics Club company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Laurier Economics Club company.

In the current year, CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia company and Laurier Economics Club company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia company nor Laurier Economics Club company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia company nor Laurier Economics Club company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia company nor Laurier Economics Club company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Laurier Economics Club company nor CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Laurier Economics Club nor CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Laurier Economics Club company.

CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia company employs more people globally than Laurier Economics Club company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Laurier Economics Club nor CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Laurier Economics Club nor CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Laurier Economics Club nor CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Laurier Economics Club nor CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Laurier Economics Club nor CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Laurier Economics Club nor CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X