Comparison Overview

Laurence & Phillips IP Law

VS

E-STET

Laurence & Phillips IP Law

2220 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, District of Columbia, 20037-1701, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Laurence & Phillips IP Law is a U.S. law firm offering patent-related services. We focus primarily on inter partes reviews (IPR) and other post-grant proceedings at the Patent Office's Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). Our intellectual property law practice also includes a range of other services such as patent preparation and prosecution, assistance to patent litigation teams, and appeals to the U.S. Court of Appeals to the Federal Circuit.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

E-STET

1149 S Hill St, Los Angeles, California, 90015, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

E-STET creates custom technology solutions to enhance the litigation strategy of corporations, AmLaw 100 firms, and boutique law firms. Started in 2007 as a collaboration of computer scientists and lawyers, E-STET creates client-specific, customized solutions to mitigate the growing costs of service and infrastructure associated with big data. E-STET offers a wide spectrum of services: data preservation, forensic collections, data processing, data analytics, technology-assisted document review, and hosted platforms for review and processing both inside and outside the enterprise.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/laurence-&-phillips-ip-law-llp.jpeg
Laurence & Phillips IP Law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/e-stet.jpeg
E-STET
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Laurence & Phillips IP Law
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
E-STET
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Laurence & Phillips IP Law in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for E-STET in 2025.

Incident History — Laurence & Phillips IP Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Laurence & Phillips IP Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — E-STET (X = Date, Y = Severity)

E-STET cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/laurence-&-phillips-ip-law-llp.jpeg
Laurence & Phillips IP Law
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/e-stet.jpeg
E-STET
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Laurence & Phillips IP Law company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to E-STET company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, E-STET company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Laurence & Phillips IP Law company.

In the current year, E-STET company and Laurence & Phillips IP Law company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither E-STET company nor Laurence & Phillips IP Law company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither E-STET company nor Laurence & Phillips IP Law company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither E-STET company nor Laurence & Phillips IP Law company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Laurence & Phillips IP Law company nor E-STET company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Laurence & Phillips IP Law nor E-STET holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Laurence & Phillips IP Law company nor E-STET company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Laurence & Phillips IP Law company employs more people globally than E-STET company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Laurence & Phillips IP Law nor E-STET holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Laurence & Phillips IP Law nor E-STET holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Laurence & Phillips IP Law nor E-STET holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Laurence & Phillips IP Law nor E-STET holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Laurence & Phillips IP Law nor E-STET holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Laurence & Phillips IP Law nor E-STET holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X