Comparison Overview

Laurel Ridge Treatment Center

VS

Achieving Joy

Laurel Ridge Treatment Center

None
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://laurelridgetc.com/

In 1987, Laurel Ridge Treatment Center opened its doors to provide specialized behavioral health care and addiction treatment on a therapeutic 18-acre campus, located in North Central San Antonio, Texas. Our 250-bed facility was designed with one mission in mind: Saving Lives, Healing Families, Creating Hope. The facility includes a charter school, gymnasium, recreational facility, playgrounds, swimming pool, ROPES (Reality-Oriented Physical Experiential Situation Course), library and dining room.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 361
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Achieving Joy

Washington, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
https://www.achievingjoy.com/

Vision Achieving Joy's vision is to empower the LGBTQ community by offering skills to build strong meaningful relationships and manifest the lives we desire. Mission Achieving Joy's mission is to heal and empower the LGBT community one person and one couple at a time. Formula If everyday you Live on Purpose + Love on Purpose + Give on Purpose = You can Achieve Joy now!

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/laurel-ridge-treatment-center.jpeg
Laurel Ridge Treatment Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/achieving-joy.jpeg
Achieving Joy
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Laurel Ridge Treatment Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Achieving Joy
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Laurel Ridge Treatment Center in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Achieving Joy in 2026.

Incident History — Laurel Ridge Treatment Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Laurel Ridge Treatment Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Achieving Joy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Achieving Joy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/laurel-ridge-treatment-center.jpeg
Laurel Ridge Treatment Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/achieving-joy.jpeg
Achieving Joy
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Achieving Joy company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Laurel Ridge Treatment Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Achieving Joy company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Laurel Ridge Treatment Center company.

In the current year, Achieving Joy company and Laurel Ridge Treatment Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Achieving Joy company nor Laurel Ridge Treatment Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Achieving Joy company nor Laurel Ridge Treatment Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Achieving Joy company nor Laurel Ridge Treatment Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Laurel Ridge Treatment Center company nor Achieving Joy company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Laurel Ridge Treatment Center nor Achieving Joy holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Laurel Ridge Treatment Center company nor Achieving Joy company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Laurel Ridge Treatment Center company employs more people globally than Achieving Joy company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Laurel Ridge Treatment Center nor Achieving Joy holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Laurel Ridge Treatment Center nor Achieving Joy holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Laurel Ridge Treatment Center nor Achieving Joy holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Laurel Ridge Treatment Center nor Achieving Joy holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Laurel Ridge Treatment Center nor Achieving Joy holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Laurel Ridge Treatment Center nor Achieving Joy holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References