Comparison Overview

Conduent Legal and Compliance Solutions

VS

OneJustice

Conduent Legal and Compliance Solutions

US, 77005
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Viewpoint is the perfect choice for those that are currently using one tool for processing, another for linear review, one more for advanced analytics and yet another for production. Lateral Data functions both as an eDiscovery services provider and as a software development company, creator of the Viewpoint eDiscovery Platform. Lateral Data has been in business since 2003 and has been performing eDiscovery services since that time. Viewpoint was developed in full use since 2006, has hundreds of very satisfied users and performed reviews on extremely high-stakes litigation and investigations for hundreds of matters. Our pricing is simple and revolves around the framework of one-primary, all-inclusive price model. The Viewpoint software was developed with a full-functioning set of administrator functions and written for clients who wish to administer their own review.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 63
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

OneJustice

433 California St., Suite 815, None, San Francisco, CA, US, 94104
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

OneJustice strengthens the legal services sector's expertise and capacity to advance justice and equity. Every day we work with lawyers and law students to empower California's most vulnerable people-people who need legal help just to gain their most basic civil rights and to meet essential human needs. These are rights and needs most of us take for granted, like food, housing, health care, and education. If these are denied, many of us can fight for them ourselves, but low-income people often need legal help to obtain these basic life necessities. OneJustice makes sure the help is there when it's needed.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 31
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/onejustice.jpeg
OneJustice
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Conduent Legal and Compliance Solutions
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
OneJustice
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Conduent Legal and Compliance Solutions in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OneJustice in 2025.

Incident History — Conduent Legal and Compliance Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Conduent Legal and Compliance Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — OneJustice (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OneJustice cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lateral-data.jpeg
Conduent Legal and Compliance Solutions
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/onejustice.jpeg
OneJustice
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Conduent Legal and Compliance Solutions company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to OneJustice company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, OneJustice company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Conduent Legal and Compliance Solutions company.

In the current year, OneJustice company and Conduent Legal and Compliance Solutions company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither OneJustice company nor Conduent Legal and Compliance Solutions company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither OneJustice company nor Conduent Legal and Compliance Solutions company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither OneJustice company nor Conduent Legal and Compliance Solutions company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Conduent Legal and Compliance Solutions company nor OneJustice company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Conduent Legal and Compliance Solutions nor OneJustice holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Conduent Legal and Compliance Solutions company nor OneJustice company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Conduent Legal and Compliance Solutions company employs more people globally than OneJustice company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Conduent Legal and Compliance Solutions nor OneJustice holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Conduent Legal and Compliance Solutions nor OneJustice holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Conduent Legal and Compliance Solutions nor OneJustice holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Conduent Legal and Compliance Solutions nor OneJustice holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Conduent Legal and Compliance Solutions nor OneJustice holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Conduent Legal and Compliance Solutions nor OneJustice holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X