Comparison Overview

Lasting Impression Direct

VS

Senoda

Lasting Impression Direct

23500 Mercantile Rd. Suite F, Cleveland, OH, 44122, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17

LASTING IMPRESSION DIRECT is a full service B to B Printing and Mailing Company. Our specialty is Targeted Direct Mail. We provide Mailing Lists and process the mail Via USPS. In addition we cater to Non Profit Organizations that are using our EXTRA MILE program which can help the participating organizations substantially.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Senoda

1050 Seventeenth Street, NW, Washington, DC, 20036, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Well established and well respected, Senoda is the perfect complement to make your vision a reality. With more than 20 years of proven experience serving our clients’ evolving needs, Senoda is ready to listen, inspire and solve. With your hard work and the Senoda team’s expertise, you can’t help but succeed. Our testimonials and references speak for themselves. Just ask us for them. Senoda has a longstanding reputation in the Nation Capitol Region for completing projects on time and on budget. Since 1988, Senoda has built its business and its reputation on a stable of proven professionals who can complete any and all functions related to production of your marketing collateral; including writing, editing, design, printing and distribution of that collateral through warehousing and mailhouse services.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lasting-impression-direct.jpeg
Lasting Impression Direct
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/senoda.jpeg
Senoda
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lasting Impression Direct
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Senoda
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lasting Impression Direct in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Senoda in 2025.

Incident History — Lasting Impression Direct (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lasting Impression Direct cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Senoda (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Senoda cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lasting-impression-direct.jpeg
Lasting Impression Direct
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/senoda.jpeg
Senoda
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Lasting Impression Direct company and Senoda company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Senoda company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lasting Impression Direct company.

In the current year, Senoda company and Lasting Impression Direct company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Senoda company nor Lasting Impression Direct company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Senoda company nor Lasting Impression Direct company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Senoda company nor Lasting Impression Direct company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lasting Impression Direct company nor Senoda company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lasting Impression Direct nor Senoda holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Lasting Impression Direct company nor Senoda company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Senoda company employs more people globally than Lasting Impression Direct company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Lasting Impression Direct nor Senoda holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lasting Impression Direct nor Senoda holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lasting Impression Direct nor Senoda holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lasting Impression Direct nor Senoda holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lasting Impression Direct nor Senoda holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lasting Impression Direct nor Senoda holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N