Comparison Overview

Laser Marking Services

VS

Graffic Traffic Company

Laser Marking Services

12675 Danielson Court, Ste. 402, Poway, CA, US, 92064
Last Update: 2025-12-10

Laser Marking Services Inc provides professional, competitively priced laser marking and laser etching services. We here at LMS offer customers a strong commitment to quality, speed and flexibility. Our vast years of experience allow us to offer a more well-rounded, excellence-oriented approach to every project. Our versatility and innovation provide customers with many different solutions to fulfill their requirements. The potential uses of laser marking are vast; electronics, aerospace components, specialty marketing, medical equipment and devices and more! High precision laser marking and laser engravings are achievable on almost any type of material including stainless steel, titanium, aluminum, wood, rubber, as well as a variety of medical-grade alloys and plastics. The process includes no toxic solvents, inks or acids. Non-contact laser printing is known for durability, high-temperature resistance, micro coded laser marks that resist high and extreme heats applied to various materials. Which means those tiny etched words or logos won’t degrade with time or cleaning! Whether you are looking to reach into new markets, trying to maintain existing business or would like to add a competitive advantage, selecting the right laser marking equipment with the best capabilities is critical. Laser marking can give you the advantage you need to compete in today’s high value markets! Contact us TODAY for the Perfect Print Solution for all your Graphic Imaging Needs!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Graffic Traffic Company

2275 Mcknight Rd. Suite 2, North St. Paul, Minnesota, 55109, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Graffic Traffic Celebrated its 31st year in business in 2022. We are a family-owned business located in North St. Paul, MN. We specialize helping our clients "put their brand in motion" with great promotional products and decorated garments. We also support them with in-house graphic design. Graffic Traffic works with all types of organizations, schools, churches, businesses, & special events.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/laser-marking-services.jpeg
Laser Marking Services
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/graffic-traffic-llc.jpeg
Graffic Traffic Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Laser Marking Services
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Graffic Traffic Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Laser Marking Services in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Graffic Traffic Company in 2025.

Incident History — Laser Marking Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Laser Marking Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Graffic Traffic Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Graffic Traffic Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/laser-marking-services.jpeg
Laser Marking Services
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/graffic-traffic-llc.jpeg
Graffic Traffic Company
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Graffic Traffic Company company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Laser Marking Services company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Graffic Traffic Company company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Laser Marking Services company.

In the current year, Graffic Traffic Company company and Laser Marking Services company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Graffic Traffic Company company nor Laser Marking Services company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Graffic Traffic Company company nor Laser Marking Services company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Graffic Traffic Company company nor Laser Marking Services company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Laser Marking Services company nor Graffic Traffic Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Laser Marking Services nor Graffic Traffic Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Laser Marking Services company nor Graffic Traffic Company company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Graffic Traffic Company company employs more people globally than Laser Marking Services company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Laser Marking Services nor Graffic Traffic Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Laser Marking Services nor Graffic Traffic Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Laser Marking Services nor Graffic Traffic Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Laser Marking Services nor Graffic Traffic Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Laser Marking Services nor Graffic Traffic Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Laser Marking Services nor Graffic Traffic Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N