Comparison Overview

Las Vegas Sands Corp.

VS

Minor Hotels Europe and Americas

Las Vegas Sands Corp.

5420 S Durango Dr, Las Vegas, Nevada, US, 89113
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 800 and 849

Founded in 1990, Las Vegas Sands is the preeminent developer and operator of world-class integrated resorts that drive valuable business and leisure tourism in the regions where we operate. Featuring an array of richly diverse and compelling offerings under one roof, our integrated resorts blend luxury hotels and state-of-the-art meeting and convention facilities with a variety of amenities such as gaming, celebrity chef restaurants, high-end shopping and an action-packed schedule of concerts, shows, exhibits and other attractions. Sands has a 30-year track record of successfully developing and operating some of the largest and most complex business and leisure properties in the world, generating significant economic benefits for our host regions and enhancing their stature as global tourism and business capitals. Our integrated resorts propel continuous positive impact through tourism, jobs and community investments that make our regions great places to live, work and visit. Sands is dedicated to being a good corporate citizen, anchored by the core tenets of serving people, planet and communities. We deliver a great working environment for our team members worldwide, drive social impact through the Sands Cares community engagement and charitable giving program and lead in environmental performance through the award-winning Sands ECO360 global sustainability program. Sands is not just a developer. We are developers of positive impact.

NAICS: 7211
NAICS Definition: Traveler Accommodation
Employees: 1,024
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Minor Hotels Europe and Americas

Santa Engracia, 120, None, Madrid, Madrid, ES, 28003
Last Update: 2025-11-22

Minor Hotels is a global hospitality leader with a network of more than 560 hotels across six continents. We drive growth through eight diverse hotel brands and a portfolio of related hospitality businesses. Perpetually driven by an entrepreneurial spirit, we create better brands, businesses and partnerships by always focusing on what matters most to our guests, team members and partners. Our eight diverse hotel brands – Anantara, Avani, Elewana, NH, NH Collection, nhow, Oaks and Tivoli – bringing our guests to the most desirable hotel and resort destinations around the world. We also own a collection of related hospitality businesses, including luxury residences, private jets, restaurants and bars, spa and wellness, and river cruises and rail journeys. #MinorHotels

NAICS: 7211
NAICS Definition: Traveler Accommodation
Employees: 10,223
Subsidiaries: 19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/las-vegas-sands-corporation.jpeg
Las Vegas Sands Corp.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nh-hotel-group.jpeg
Minor Hotels Europe and Americas
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Las Vegas Sands Corp.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Minor Hotels Europe and Americas
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Las Vegas Sands Corp. in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Minor Hotels Europe and Americas in 2025.

Incident History — Las Vegas Sands Corp. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Las Vegas Sands Corp. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Minor Hotels Europe and Americas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Minor Hotels Europe and Americas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/las-vegas-sands-corporation.jpeg
Las Vegas Sands Corp.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nh-hotel-group.jpeg
Minor Hotels Europe and Americas
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Las Vegas Sands Corp. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Minor Hotels Europe and Americas company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Minor Hotels Europe and Americas company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Las Vegas Sands Corp. company.

In the current year, Minor Hotels Europe and Americas company and Las Vegas Sands Corp. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Minor Hotels Europe and Americas company nor Las Vegas Sands Corp. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Minor Hotels Europe and Americas company nor Las Vegas Sands Corp. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Minor Hotels Europe and Americas company nor Las Vegas Sands Corp. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Las Vegas Sands Corp. company nor Minor Hotels Europe and Americas company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Las Vegas Sands Corp. nor Minor Hotels Europe and Americas holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Minor Hotels Europe and Americas company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Las Vegas Sands Corp. company.

Minor Hotels Europe and Americas company employs more people globally than Las Vegas Sands Corp. company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitality.

Neither Las Vegas Sands Corp. nor Minor Hotels Europe and Americas holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Las Vegas Sands Corp. nor Minor Hotels Europe and Americas holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Las Vegas Sands Corp. nor Minor Hotels Europe and Americas holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Las Vegas Sands Corp. nor Minor Hotels Europe and Americas holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Las Vegas Sands Corp. nor Minor Hotels Europe and Americas holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Las Vegas Sands Corp. nor Minor Hotels Europe and Americas holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H