Comparison Overview

Larz Anderson Auto Museum

VS

Oklahoma Hall of Fame

Larz Anderson Auto Museum

15 NEWTON ST, Brookline, Massachusetts 02445, us
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

The Larz Anderson Auto Museum is home to "America’s Oldest Car Collection". For more than eighty-five years the Larz Anderson Auto Museum has been supporting the community through a variety of educational programs, exhibits, and lectures. Today the Museum's primary goal is its continued support of the community through educational outreach and the preservation of our permanent collection of early automobiles. The Larz Anderson Auto Museum hopes to serve as a resource for your automotive and cultural interests.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Oklahoma Hall of Fame

1400 Classen Drive, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73106, US
Last Update: 2026-01-09
Between 750 and 799

The Oklahoma Hall of Fame was created to honor extraordinary Oklahomans and to provide educational programming for students of all ages. Since our founding in 1927, the organization has grown to support education in a variety of ways including awarding tuition grants and scholarships, providing free statewide field trips, hosting Homeschool Days, offering free family fun days with interactive art activities, and donating our published books to schools and libraries across Oklahoma. MISSION The Oklahoma Hall of Fame tells Oklahoma’s story through its people. From diverse statewide programming to the historic Gaylord-Pickens Museum, we are creating an enhanced sense of pride for all Oklahomans. VISION We believe there are no limits to what is possible. Every day we celebrate the legacy of inspiring Oklahomans with all generations because Oklahomans are changing the world.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 37
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/larz-anderson-auto-museum.jpeg
Larz Anderson Auto Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oklahoma-heritage-association-and-gaylord-pickens-museum.jpeg
Oklahoma Hall of Fame
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Larz Anderson Auto Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Oklahoma Hall of Fame
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Larz Anderson Auto Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Oklahoma Hall of Fame in 2026.

Incident History — Larz Anderson Auto Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Larz Anderson Auto Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Oklahoma Hall of Fame (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Oklahoma Hall of Fame cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/larz-anderson-auto-museum.jpeg
Larz Anderson Auto Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oklahoma-heritage-association-and-gaylord-pickens-museum.jpeg
Oklahoma Hall of Fame
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Larz Anderson Auto Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Oklahoma Hall of Fame company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Oklahoma Hall of Fame company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Larz Anderson Auto Museum company.

In the current year, Oklahoma Hall of Fame company and Larz Anderson Auto Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Oklahoma Hall of Fame company nor Larz Anderson Auto Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Oklahoma Hall of Fame company nor Larz Anderson Auto Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Oklahoma Hall of Fame company nor Larz Anderson Auto Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Larz Anderson Auto Museum company nor Oklahoma Hall of Fame company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Larz Anderson Auto Museum nor Oklahoma Hall of Fame holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Larz Anderson Auto Museum company nor Oklahoma Hall of Fame company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Oklahoma Hall of Fame company employs more people globally than Larz Anderson Auto Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Larz Anderson Auto Museum nor Oklahoma Hall of Fame holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Larz Anderson Auto Museum nor Oklahoma Hall of Fame holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Larz Anderson Auto Museum nor Oklahoma Hall of Fame holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Larz Anderson Auto Museum nor Oklahoma Hall of Fame holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Larz Anderson Auto Museum nor Oklahoma Hall of Fame holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Larz Anderson Auto Museum nor Oklahoma Hall of Fame holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N