Comparison Overview

Larsen (a RAZR company)

VS

Manual

Larsen (a RAZR company)

7101 York Avenue South, Minneapolis, 55435, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

Smart Strategy. Strong Creative. Larsen is an award-winning Minneapolis design firm specializing in branding, communications, digital, and experience design. For 39 years, Larsen has provided high-quality strategic and creative solutions to a national client base. Larsen was acquired by RAZR (www.razrhq.com) in 2015. Brand Strategy Brand Architecture Brand Positioning Research Messaging Naming Logos Taglines Visual Systems Communications Strategy Campaigns Collateral Product Launches Packaging Publications Content Digital Strategy SEO Desktop and Mobile Web Design Email Marketing Event Branding Event Marketing Wayfinding Sign Systems Environmental Graphics

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 52
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Manual

610 22nd St, San Francisco, California, 94107, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01

Manual: Shaping and amplifying world-changing ideas. We are a team of curious designers, communicators, and thinkers driven by the belief that bold creativity can positively shape society and culture. From our studios in San Francisco and Amsterdam, we partner with visionary clients—big and small—who challenge conventions and inspire meaningful change. ​ We develop strategies and design experiences that empower businesses and organizations to create lasting impact and move the world forward.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 39
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/larsen.jpeg
Larsen (a RAZR company)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/manual.jpeg
Manual
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Larsen (a RAZR company)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Manual
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Larsen (a RAZR company) in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Manual in 2025.

Incident History — Larsen (a RAZR company) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Larsen (a RAZR company) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Manual (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Manual cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/larsen.jpeg
Larsen (a RAZR company)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/manual.jpeg
Manual
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Larsen (a RAZR company) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Manual company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Manual company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Larsen (a RAZR company) company.

In the current year, Manual company and Larsen (a RAZR company) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Manual company nor Larsen (a RAZR company) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Manual company nor Larsen (a RAZR company) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Manual company nor Larsen (a RAZR company) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Larsen (a RAZR company) company nor Manual company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Larsen (a RAZR company) nor Manual holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Larsen (a RAZR company) company nor Manual company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Larsen (a RAZR company) company employs more people globally than Manual company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Larsen (a RAZR company) nor Manual holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Larsen (a RAZR company) nor Manual holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Larsen (a RAZR company) nor Manual holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Larsen (a RAZR company) nor Manual holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Larsen (a RAZR company) nor Manual holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Larsen (a RAZR company) nor Manual holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X