Comparison Overview

Larkins Vacura Kayser LLP

VS

Stenning’s Chambers

Larkins Vacura Kayser LLP

121 SW Morrison St, None, Portland, Oregon, US, None
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Whether Larkins Vacura Kayser is representing a multi-national company in a multi-million dollar dispute, a mid-size client in a “Bet the Company” battle, or an individual in a heated real estate dispute, we believe we are the best at what we do. Because we focus on what we do best. LVK works to understand what matters most to you in your case—factoring in financial stakes, risk tolerance and the legal and factual complexities. We do this to tailor the type and level of service each client needs to achieve the best outcome. We clarify the complex and quickly cut to the strategies, evidence and arguments that will ring loud, clear and true with decision makers. Compared to other, often larger firms, we staff matters leanly with the belief that a well-placed approach isn’t about the numbers. It’s about the talent. We apply left and right brain thinking in all we do—we are practical and creative, disciplined and resourceful, process-driven and agile. After more than 20 years of doing what we do best, litigation has become art for us. And our results speak for themselves.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Stenning’s Chambers

The Highlands, 201 Hillard Drive, West Bay, Grand Cayman, undefined, KY
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Stenning's Chambers limits its practice to litigation and investigations. With only a limited number of engagements accepted and active at any time, we ensure that every client can benefit from having access to an ‘Assigned Counsel’, the same having the capacity to be responsive and supportive throughout the life of the case. We have an innovative approach to valuing our services, offering various options (to include fixed-fees) which enable our clients to benefit from a higher degree of certainty as to the costs they will incur for our services. Strictly subject to obtaining limited admission or approvals (where required); we have access to a plethora of tenant attorneys, door tenants,specialist barristers (to include Queens Counsel) and academic lawyers. With such resources at our disposal, we can build a team to suit whatever the complexity and/or demands of any particular instructions.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/larkins-vacura-kayser-llp.jpeg
Larkins Vacura Kayser LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stenning-&-associates.jpeg
Stenning’s Chambers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Larkins Vacura Kayser LLP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Stenning’s Chambers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Larkins Vacura Kayser LLP in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stenning’s Chambers in 2025.

Incident History — Larkins Vacura Kayser LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Larkins Vacura Kayser LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Stenning’s Chambers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stenning’s Chambers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/larkins-vacura-kayser-llp.jpeg
Larkins Vacura Kayser LLP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stenning-&-associates.jpeg
Stenning’s Chambers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Larkins Vacura Kayser LLP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Stenning’s Chambers company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Stenning’s Chambers company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Larkins Vacura Kayser LLP company.

In the current year, Stenning’s Chambers company and Larkins Vacura Kayser LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Stenning’s Chambers company nor Larkins Vacura Kayser LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Stenning’s Chambers company nor Larkins Vacura Kayser LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Stenning’s Chambers company nor Larkins Vacura Kayser LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Larkins Vacura Kayser LLP company nor Stenning’s Chambers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Larkins Vacura Kayser LLP nor Stenning’s Chambers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Larkins Vacura Kayser LLP company nor Stenning’s Chambers company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Larkins Vacura Kayser LLP company employs more people globally than Stenning’s Chambers company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Larkins Vacura Kayser LLP nor Stenning’s Chambers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Larkins Vacura Kayser LLP nor Stenning’s Chambers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Larkins Vacura Kayser LLP nor Stenning’s Chambers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Larkins Vacura Kayser LLP nor Stenning’s Chambers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Larkins Vacura Kayser LLP nor Stenning’s Chambers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Larkins Vacura Kayser LLP nor Stenning’s Chambers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X