Comparison Overview

Lane Neave

VS

Express Network, A Legal Support Network Co.

Lane Neave

141 Cambridge Terrace, Christchurch, Canterbury, NZ, 8013
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

At Lane Neave we thrive on making complex issues simple for our clients. We do that by providing plain English advice that doesn’t sit on the fence. Recognised nationally as one of New Zealand’s leading law firms, Lane Neave is a full-service law firm located in Auckland, Wellington, Christchurch and Queenstown with a local and global client base. The diverse and eclectic nature of our legal minds means that we have the depth of knowledge and experience required for any job. It’s also what makes our thinking innovative and gives our clients an edge. Our entrepreneurial thinking means we design and tailor our legal teams around your requirements. Together we can tackle anything.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 147
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Express Network, A Legal Support Network Co.

1605 W Olympic Blvd, Los Angeles, California, 90015, US
Last Update: 2025-11-30
Between 750 and 799

Express Network provides complete legal support services to the most respected law firms in California and throughout the nation. Express Network has an experienced staff that specialize in a variety of services including: Court Services, Service of Process, Messenger, Unlawful Detainer, Collection, Writ, Levy and Records Retrieval, and Imaging Solutions Services. We are certified EFSP (Electronic Filing Service Provider) for Los Angeles Superior Court and all other courts that required e-filing. We are dedicated to putting the client's needs first and holding the highest standard of service within the industry. With offices throughout California, our staff is committed to providing efficient and reliable attorney and messenger services to our clients. With a network of reliable affiliates throughout the United States, Express Network is able to provide the best legal support services virtually anywhere. We have the knowledge and experience to assure the job is done right the first time.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 48
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lane-neave.jpeg
Lane Neave
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lane Neave
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Express Network, A Legal Support Network Co.
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lane Neave in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Express Network, A Legal Support Network Co. in 2025.

Incident History — Lane Neave (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lane Neave cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Express Network, A Legal Support Network Co. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Express Network, A Legal Support Network Co. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lane-neave.jpeg
Lane Neave
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/express-network-legal-support-network-llc.jpeg
Express Network, A Legal Support Network Co.
Incidents

FAQ

Lane Neave company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Express Network, A Legal Support Network Co. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Express Network, A Legal Support Network Co. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lane Neave company.

In the current year, Express Network, A Legal Support Network Co. company and Lane Neave company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Express Network, A Legal Support Network Co. company nor Lane Neave company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Express Network, A Legal Support Network Co. company nor Lane Neave company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Express Network, A Legal Support Network Co. company nor Lane Neave company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lane Neave company nor Express Network, A Legal Support Network Co. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lane Neave nor Express Network, A Legal Support Network Co. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Lane Neave company nor Express Network, A Legal Support Network Co. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lane Neave company employs more people globally than Express Network, A Legal Support Network Co. company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Lane Neave nor Express Network, A Legal Support Network Co. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lane Neave nor Express Network, A Legal Support Network Co. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lane Neave nor Express Network, A Legal Support Network Co. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lane Neave nor Express Network, A Legal Support Network Co. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lane Neave nor Express Network, A Legal Support Network Co. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lane Neave nor Express Network, A Legal Support Network Co. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X