Comparison Overview

LandmarkPrint

VS

CDS Publications

LandmarkPrint

375 Fairfield Avenue, Stamford, CT, 06902, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

LandmarkPrint provides integrated digital print production services, promotional signage, and displays to customers in New York, Connecticut, and New Jersey. We offer cost-effective solutions and innovative approaches to communicating your brand, products, and services. But just as important, we work to understand your business goals, the challenges you face, and anticipate your needs. We make it easier for you to do business. Our experienced team of professionals helps customers achieve maximum impact on a project-by-project basis through Digital Printing, Large Format Graphics & Displays, Personalized Direct Mail and Fulfillment Services, Online Ordering, and National Distribution. Our customers - nationally and internationally renowned marketers - attest to our value as problem-solvers, logjam-breakers, and creative thinkers. LandmarkPrint has been consistently ranked in the “Top 25” nationally for digital print production companies for almost 35 years. We are the largest print service provider in southern Fairfield County. Thank you for visiting our company page. We look forward to hearing from you!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 36
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

CDS Publications

2655 S Pacific HWY, Medford, 97501, US
Last Update: 2025-12-14

CDS, An RR Donnelley Company, is a full service printing company offering global solutions to Fortune 500 businesses. Your imagination fuels our passion, our presses, our technology, and our team. At CDS, your success is our number one goal. We leverage one of the largest digital printing footprint to bring you closer to your customers.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 87
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/landmark-print.jpeg
LandmarkPrint
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cds-publications.jpeg
CDS Publications
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
LandmarkPrint
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CDS Publications
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LandmarkPrint in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CDS Publications in 2025.

Incident History — LandmarkPrint (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LandmarkPrint cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CDS Publications (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CDS Publications cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/landmark-print.jpeg
LandmarkPrint
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cds-publications.jpeg
CDS Publications
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CDS Publications company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to LandmarkPrint company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, CDS Publications company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to LandmarkPrint company.

In the current year, CDS Publications company and LandmarkPrint company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CDS Publications company nor LandmarkPrint company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CDS Publications company nor LandmarkPrint company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CDS Publications company nor LandmarkPrint company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither LandmarkPrint company nor CDS Publications company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither LandmarkPrint nor CDS Publications holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither LandmarkPrint company nor CDS Publications company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

CDS Publications company employs more people globally than LandmarkPrint company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither LandmarkPrint nor CDS Publications holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither LandmarkPrint nor CDS Publications holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither LandmarkPrint nor CDS Publications holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither LandmarkPrint nor CDS Publications holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither LandmarkPrint nor CDS Publications holds HIPAA certification.

Neither LandmarkPrint nor CDS Publications holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N