Comparison Overview

Landel Controls

VS

Quest Service Labs Inc

Landel Controls

3442 118ave S.E., Calgary, Alberta, T2Z3X1, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Landel Controls Ltd. is a Division of Shelley Automation Ltd. We are a Western Canadian company which has been in operation for over 30 years. With offices in Vancouver, Calgary, Edmonton, Regina, and Winnipeg, we provide products and service throughout Western Canada. Our strength and our success come from meeting your needs through innovative solutions. We are proud that our customers call us problem solvers and not a sales organization. We specialize in non-contact sensing, motion control, and cable/hose management. Whether your need is as simple as a proximity switch or as complex as a multi-axis servo system, our technical sales staff and applications personnel are fully trained and capable to assist you. Landel Controls Ltd. services the product lines that we represent. We have demonstration equipment for our product lines, which gives our customers a hands-on feel for the product before purchasing. These units also allow our sales staff to train the customers on setup procedures, programming, and capabilities. We also offer training and information seminars at customer locations at no cost. This gives you a great opportunity to get to know our products, our capabilities, and us. Landel Con

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Quest Service Labs Inc

2307 E Aurora Rd Unit B-10, Twinsburg, Ohio, 44087-1958, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25

Quest Service Labs provides Prime Labeling and Printing Solutions to meet the tough challenges of modern labeling needs from turnkey labeling systems, RFID printers and scanners to label application software and labeling automation. Our professionals are factory trained by every manufacturer we partner with, giving us the technical expertise to service and maintain your system from sale to upgrade.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/landel-controls.jpeg
Landel Controls
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/quest-service-labs-inc.jpeg
Quest Service Labs Inc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Landel Controls
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Quest Service Labs Inc
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Landel Controls in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Quest Service Labs Inc in 2025.

Incident History — Landel Controls (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Landel Controls cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Quest Service Labs Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Quest Service Labs Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/landel-controls.jpeg
Landel Controls
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/quest-service-labs-inc.jpeg
Quest Service Labs Inc
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Quest Service Labs Inc company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Landel Controls company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Quest Service Labs Inc company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Landel Controls company.

In the current year, Quest Service Labs Inc company and Landel Controls company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Quest Service Labs Inc company nor Landel Controls company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Quest Service Labs Inc company nor Landel Controls company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Quest Service Labs Inc company nor Landel Controls company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Landel Controls company nor Quest Service Labs Inc company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Landel Controls nor Quest Service Labs Inc holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Landel Controls company nor Quest Service Labs Inc company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Landel Controls company employs more people globally than Quest Service Labs Inc company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither Landel Controls nor Quest Service Labs Inc holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Landel Controls nor Quest Service Labs Inc holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Landel Controls nor Quest Service Labs Inc holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Landel Controls nor Quest Service Labs Inc holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Landel Controls nor Quest Service Labs Inc holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Landel Controls nor Quest Service Labs Inc holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H