Comparison Overview

LandAid

VS

PledgeCents

LandAid

St Albans House, London, undefined, SW1Y 4QX, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-19
Between 750 and 799

LandAid is the property industry charity, working to #EndYouthHomelessness in the UK. We bring the property industry together to support charities delivering life-changing services for young people who are or have been homeless, or who are at risk of homelessness in the future. Through a unique network of corporate partners, we invest funding and expertise where we can achieve lasting impact.

NAICS: 561
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 87
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

PledgeCents

2401 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19403, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

PledgeCents is the social impact marketplace that is leveraging our unique funding solution to bring more technology and resources into communities around the world PledgeCents allows anyone to raise funds for any education or community need using a secure and easy platform. We have impacted over 800,000 community members and have raised over $1,500,000 for community needs. We partner with over 70 companies in our marketplace (i.e. Best Buy, littleBits, Nearpod, Mackin). Over 3,000 schools choose PledgeCents because some of our great benefits: 1) keep what you raise even if you don't meet your goal 2) flexibility to raise funds for any need from any vendor 3) 0% platform fees 4) integrates with current non-profit fundraising policies and processes. 'Because Every Cent Counts'​

NAICS: 561
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/landaid-charitable-trust-limited.jpeg
LandAid
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pledgecents.jpeg
PledgeCents
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
LandAid
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
PledgeCents
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LandAid in 2025.

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PledgeCents in 2025.

Incident History — LandAid (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LandAid cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — PledgeCents (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PledgeCents cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/landaid-charitable-trust-limited.jpeg
LandAid
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pledgecents.jpeg
PledgeCents
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

LandAid company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to PledgeCents company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, PledgeCents company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to LandAid company.

In the current year, PledgeCents company and LandAid company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither PledgeCents company nor LandAid company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither PledgeCents company nor LandAid company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither PledgeCents company nor LandAid company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither LandAid company nor PledgeCents company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither LandAid nor PledgeCents holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither LandAid company nor PledgeCents company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

LandAid company employs more people globally than PledgeCents company, reflecting its scale as a Fundraising.

Neither LandAid nor PledgeCents holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither LandAid nor PledgeCents holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither LandAid nor PledgeCents holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither LandAid nor PledgeCents holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither LandAid nor PledgeCents holds HIPAA certification.

Neither LandAid nor PledgeCents holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N