Comparison Overview

Lanco Integrated

VS

Lehigh Fluid Power, Inc.

Lanco Integrated

12 Thomas Drive, Westbrook , Me, 04092, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26

With our problem-solving DNA going back to 1873, Lanco has been advancing in the automation industry since 1984 - expanding our design, build, and integration capabilities - specializing in modular, flexible, powered and free assembly and test systems. Our expertise and unique solutions solve complex assembly and test production challenges requiring Precision Engineering Automation. With thousands of production equipment and systems installed in over 30 countries, Lanco has the depth and extensive experience to meeting the ever-changing demands of the applications we support in medical device, consumer products, automotive, defense, electronics and industrial products manufacturing.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 151
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Lehigh Fluid Power, Inc.

1413 Route 179, Lambertville, NJ, 08530, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

In 1964, Lehigh, Inc. of Easton PA spun off the Air Control Division as Lehigh Fluid Power, Inc. Lehigh Fluid Power moved to our current facility in Lambertville, New Jersey in 1972 and have been manufacturing a full line of tie rod NFPA actuators and a wide array of specialty and stainless steel actuators. In March 2015 Lehigh acquired Ortman Fluid Power, Inc. as a wholly owned subsidiary located in Quincy IL. In March 2017, Lehigh acquired Ruggieri Precision Machine to greatly expand our repair and machining capabilities. Lehigh Fluid Power serves industries including: • Conventional, Waste to Energy and Nuclear Power • Tire Manufacturing • Valve Manufacturing • Food Processing • Construction and Mining • Printing and Binding • Material Handling and Automation • Industrial Laundries • Packaging

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lanco-assembly-systems.jpeg
Lanco Integrated
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lehigh-fluid-power-inc-.jpeg
Lehigh Fluid Power, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lanco Integrated
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lehigh Fluid Power, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lanco Integrated in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lehigh Fluid Power, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Lanco Integrated (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lanco Integrated cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lehigh Fluid Power, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lehigh Fluid Power, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lanco-assembly-systems.jpeg
Lanco Integrated
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lehigh-fluid-power-inc-.jpeg
Lehigh Fluid Power, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lanco Integrated company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Lehigh Fluid Power, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Lehigh Fluid Power, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lanco Integrated company.

In the current year, Lehigh Fluid Power, Inc. company and Lanco Integrated company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lehigh Fluid Power, Inc. company nor Lanco Integrated company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lehigh Fluid Power, Inc. company nor Lanco Integrated company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lehigh Fluid Power, Inc. company nor Lanco Integrated company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lanco Integrated company nor Lehigh Fluid Power, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lanco Integrated nor Lehigh Fluid Power, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Lanco Integrated company nor Lehigh Fluid Power, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lanco Integrated company employs more people globally than Lehigh Fluid Power, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither Lanco Integrated nor Lehigh Fluid Power, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lanco Integrated nor Lehigh Fluid Power, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lanco Integrated nor Lehigh Fluid Power, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lanco Integrated nor Lehigh Fluid Power, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lanco Integrated nor Lehigh Fluid Power, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lanco Integrated nor Lehigh Fluid Power, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H