Comparison Overview

Lamkin Corporation

VS

Gear Coop

Lamkin Corporation

6530 Gateway Park Drive, San Diego, CA, 92154, US
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 750 and 799

Lamkin Corporation, a privately-owned company headquartered in San Diego, is the original manufacturer of premium golf club grips. The company was established in 1925 and initially provided top golf club maker's with leather grips. Over the last 90 years, Lamkin has evolved into the world's leading producer of high-performance golf grips. The most esteemed brands in golf trust Lamkin grips on their premium clubs, along with top Tour players, thousands of PGA professionals and millions of worldwide golfers. Lamkin Grips is dedicated to connecting golfers to a more confident, consistent and enjoyable game.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 131
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Gear Coop

1420 Village Way, Santa Ana, 92705, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Established in 2009 in Costa Mesa, California, Gear Coop is an outdoor retailer known for their “triple guarantee”—free return shipping, free 2-day shipping, and a lifetime guarantee on all products—which is totally unique within the outdoor industry. Hearkening back to their roots as a climbing shop, Gear Coop prides itself on its extensive variety of climbing gear, with over 100 models of climbing shoes plus harnesses, carabiners, and sport and trad gear always in stock. However, Gear Coop and its team of “GearCoopers” strive to outfit everyone who loves being outdoors. From backpacking to backcountry snowsports, they stock top brands including Arc’teryx, adidas Outdoor, The North Face, Mountain Hardwear, La Sportiva, Black Diamond, GoPro, and countless others. Shop and get more information at www.gearcoop.com.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lamkin-corporation.jpeg
Lamkin Corporation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gear-co-op.jpeg
Gear Coop
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lamkin Corporation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Gear Coop
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lamkin Corporation in 2025.

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gear Coop in 2025.

Incident History — Lamkin Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lamkin Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Gear Coop (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gear Coop cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lamkin-corporation.jpeg
Lamkin Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gear-co-op.jpeg
Gear Coop
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lamkin Corporation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Gear Coop company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Gear Coop company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lamkin Corporation company.

In the current year, Gear Coop company and Lamkin Corporation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Gear Coop company nor Lamkin Corporation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Gear Coop company nor Lamkin Corporation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Gear Coop company nor Lamkin Corporation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lamkin Corporation company nor Gear Coop company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lamkin Corporation nor Gear Coop holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Lamkin Corporation company nor Gear Coop company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lamkin Corporation company employs more people globally than Gear Coop company, reflecting its scale as a Sporting Goods.

Neither Lamkin Corporation nor Gear Coop holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lamkin Corporation nor Gear Coop holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lamkin Corporation nor Gear Coop holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lamkin Corporation nor Gear Coop holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lamkin Corporation nor Gear Coop holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lamkin Corporation nor Gear Coop holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H