Comparison Overview

Lamb Chambers

VS

RMZ Law | Rogers, Morris & Ziegler LLP

Lamb Chambers

Middle Temple, London, EC4Y 7, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Lamb chambers is a highly respected set that has more than 50 barristers who can help you with specialist advocacy and advice across the whole legal spectrum. We are committed to understanding your needs, offering advice and representation aimed at achieving the best outcome possible, and delivering successful results. We are located at Temple, in the heart of London’s legal district, and we have a reputation for providing a friendly and professional services for our clients across the UK and internationally.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 67
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

RMZ Law | Rogers, Morris & Ziegler LLP

1401 E. Broward Boulevard, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33301, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Serving our clients and the community since 1925. Rogers, Morris & Ziegler LLP has provided personalized, quality legal advice and services, earning not only the respect of our clients but also Martindale-Hubbell's highest rating for legal ability and ethical standards. To meet clients'​ changing legal needs, the partners have acquired expertise in special areas of law, including trial practice, real estate, business transactions, banking, wills, trusts, estate planning and probate, governmental and administrative law, and family practice. Rogers, Morris & Ziegler LLP exists to serve its clients'​ best interest and its mission is to always provide personalized, quality legal advice and services for a fair fee. Our attorneys and staff treat each other and our clients like family and do our best to zealously represent their interests, working at the highest ethical level. As the oldest law firm founded in Broward County, RMZ is deeply rooted in the community and has a tradition of protecting the best interests of the individuals, businesses and public entities that we represent.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lamb-chambers.jpeg
Lamb Chambers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rogers-morris-and-ziegler-llp.jpeg
RMZ Law | Rogers, Morris & Ziegler LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lamb Chambers
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
RMZ Law | Rogers, Morris & Ziegler LLP
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lamb Chambers in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RMZ Law | Rogers, Morris & Ziegler LLP in 2025.

Incident History — Lamb Chambers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lamb Chambers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — RMZ Law | Rogers, Morris & Ziegler LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RMZ Law | Rogers, Morris & Ziegler LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lamb-chambers.jpeg
Lamb Chambers
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rogers-morris-and-ziegler-llp.jpeg
RMZ Law | Rogers, Morris & Ziegler LLP
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

RMZ Law | Rogers, Morris & Ziegler LLP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Lamb Chambers company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, RMZ Law | Rogers, Morris & Ziegler LLP company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lamb Chambers company.

In the current year, RMZ Law | Rogers, Morris & Ziegler LLP company and Lamb Chambers company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither RMZ Law | Rogers, Morris & Ziegler LLP company nor Lamb Chambers company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither RMZ Law | Rogers, Morris & Ziegler LLP company nor Lamb Chambers company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither RMZ Law | Rogers, Morris & Ziegler LLP company nor Lamb Chambers company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lamb Chambers company nor RMZ Law | Rogers, Morris & Ziegler LLP company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lamb Chambers nor RMZ Law | Rogers, Morris & Ziegler LLP holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Lamb Chambers company nor RMZ Law | Rogers, Morris & Ziegler LLP company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lamb Chambers company employs more people globally than RMZ Law | Rogers, Morris & Ziegler LLP company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Lamb Chambers nor RMZ Law | Rogers, Morris & Ziegler LLP holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lamb Chambers nor RMZ Law | Rogers, Morris & Ziegler LLP holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lamb Chambers nor RMZ Law | Rogers, Morris & Ziegler LLP holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lamb Chambers nor RMZ Law | Rogers, Morris & Ziegler LLP holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lamb Chambers nor RMZ Law | Rogers, Morris & Ziegler LLP holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lamb Chambers nor RMZ Law | Rogers, Morris & Ziegler LLP holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X