Comparison Overview

Lamb Chambers

VS

Janney & Janney Legal Support Service

Lamb Chambers

Middle Temple, London, EC4Y 7, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Lamb chambers is a highly respected set that has more than 50 barristers who can help you with specialist advocacy and advice across the whole legal spectrum. We are committed to understanding your needs, offering advice and representation aimed at achieving the best outcome possible, and delivering successful results. We are located at Temple, in the heart of London’s legal district, and we have a reputation for providing a friendly and professional services for our clients across the UK and internationally.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 67
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Janney & Janney Legal Support Service

1545 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 311, Los Angeles, CA, 90017, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Janney & Janney Legal Support Service has provided quality legal support since 1973, and we are constantly evolving to meet the shifting demands of our clients. Janney and Janney has been active in the growth of the attorney service industry, both in the state of California, as well as nationwide. Janney & Janney is a member of the California Association of Legal Support Professionals (CALSPro), and a founding member of the National Association of Professional Process Servers (NAPPS). Janney & Janney is driven by the needs of our clients. We take pride in setting a high standard of professional and efficient service. Our offices are located in Los Angeles, Orange County, San Diego County, Inland Empire, and Ventura County. We also have a large network of affiliates extending nationwide, making it possible to get the job done for you. Janney & Janney offers legal support services. Court Filings, Fax and E-filings, Research and Record Retrieval, County Recordings, Service of Process, Writs and Levies, and Skip Tracing.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 42
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lamb-chambers.jpeg
Lamb Chambers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lamb Chambers
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Janney & Janney Legal Support Service
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lamb Chambers in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Janney & Janney Legal Support Service in 2025.

Incident History — Lamb Chambers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lamb Chambers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Janney & Janney Legal Support Service (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Janney & Janney Legal Support Service cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lamb-chambers.jpeg
Lamb Chambers
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/janney-&-janney-attorney-service-inc-.jpeg
Janney & Janney Legal Support Service
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Janney & Janney Legal Support Service company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Lamb Chambers company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Janney & Janney Legal Support Service company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lamb Chambers company.

In the current year, Janney & Janney Legal Support Service company and Lamb Chambers company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Janney & Janney Legal Support Service company nor Lamb Chambers company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Janney & Janney Legal Support Service company nor Lamb Chambers company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Janney & Janney Legal Support Service company nor Lamb Chambers company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lamb Chambers company nor Janney & Janney Legal Support Service company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lamb Chambers nor Janney & Janney Legal Support Service holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Lamb Chambers company nor Janney & Janney Legal Support Service company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lamb Chambers company employs more people globally than Janney & Janney Legal Support Service company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Lamb Chambers nor Janney & Janney Legal Support Service holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lamb Chambers nor Janney & Janney Legal Support Service holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lamb Chambers nor Janney & Janney Legal Support Service holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lamb Chambers nor Janney & Janney Legal Support Service holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lamb Chambers nor Janney & Janney Legal Support Service holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lamb Chambers nor Janney & Janney Legal Support Service holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X