Comparison Overview

Lamatas un slazdi

VS

Thoroughbred Design Group

Lamatas un slazdi

Ģertrūdes 5a-10, Riga, LV1010, LV
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Graphic design and photo studio "Lamatas un slazdi" was found in 1999, Riga, Latvia. Now company is located in Latvia and also in Mexico city (Mexico). Graphic design: typefaces, web design, corporate identity, catalogs, illustrations, book covers, layouts etc. Photography: fashion, portfolios for models, catalogs, portraits, architecture, advertising, etc. Main works (last 3 years): 2009 Client: Pure chocolate - Project: webpage, catalog, packaging Project: Graphic design for the Festival of Mexican Films 2008 Client: Sony Baltic - Project: HD campaign, illustrations, animation Client: "Dienas gramata" publishing house Projects: book cover designs Client: internet portal Inbox.lv - Project: campaign "The Main Sponsor of the Olympic Games" 2007 Client: "Liels un mazs" publishing house Project: graphic novel "Pingus Posta piedzivojumi" ("The Adventures of Pingus Posts") illustrations, audio CD cover, etc. Client: Cabinet of Ministers - Project: The Graphic Standard of the Prime Minister of Latvia Client: ,,Rigas satiksme" Riga Public Transportation - Project: Corporate Graphic Standard

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Thoroughbred Design Group

undefined, Cumming, Georgia, 30041, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02

Thoroughbred Design Group is a creative agency headquartered in Alpharetta, GA. We provide award-winning graphic design for our clients, and help take their marketing efforts to the next level. Whether your needs range from direct mail and advertisement or identity development and annual report design, Thoroughbred Design Group will provide creative options to satisfy the most discriminating tastes. Working together with our clients, we produce winning results.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lamatas-un-slazdi.jpeg
Lamatas un slazdi
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thoroughbred-design-group.jpeg
Thoroughbred Design Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lamatas un slazdi
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Thoroughbred Design Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lamatas un slazdi in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Thoroughbred Design Group in 2025.

Incident History — Lamatas un slazdi (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lamatas un slazdi cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Thoroughbred Design Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Thoroughbred Design Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lamatas-un-slazdi.jpeg
Lamatas un slazdi
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thoroughbred-design-group.jpeg
Thoroughbred Design Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lamatas un slazdi company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Thoroughbred Design Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Thoroughbred Design Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lamatas un slazdi company.

In the current year, Thoroughbred Design Group company and Lamatas un slazdi company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Thoroughbred Design Group company nor Lamatas un slazdi company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Thoroughbred Design Group company nor Lamatas un slazdi company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Thoroughbred Design Group company nor Lamatas un slazdi company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lamatas un slazdi company nor Thoroughbred Design Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lamatas un slazdi nor Thoroughbred Design Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Lamatas un slazdi company nor Thoroughbred Design Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lamatas un slazdi company employs more people globally than Thoroughbred Design Group company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Lamatas un slazdi nor Thoroughbred Design Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lamatas un slazdi nor Thoroughbred Design Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lamatas un slazdi nor Thoroughbred Design Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lamatas un slazdi nor Thoroughbred Design Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lamatas un slazdi nor Thoroughbred Design Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lamatas un slazdi nor Thoroughbred Design Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X