Comparison Overview

Lam, Lyn & Philip, P.C.

VS

Lawyers Clearinghouse

Lam, Lyn & Philip, P.C.

6213 Skyline Drive, Houston, TX 77057, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Lam Lyn Philip is a Texas based law firm founded in 1994. The firm focus is on Commercial Collections Litigation. Among the firms’ clients are private companies –including more than a third of the US Fortune 100, and governmental entities. Our representation spans across a broad range of industries, including banks and other financial institutions, Oil & Gas, Manufacturing and Technology companies. Lam Lyn Philip has a unique, flexible, entrepreneurial culture that fosters mutually beneficial relationships with our clients. Our attorneys make it their job to understand our clients’ business goals and utilize the law to achieve those goals. We have consistently earned a reputation for being a trusted partner, willing to share the risks of litigation. Our commitment to superb client service is unyielding and permeates throughout the firm. We are cognizant of the fact that we are often the face of our client in the eyes of the public and we must carry and conduct ourselves in a manner that reflects the expectations and culture of our clients. Consistent with the principles of the founders, the firm requires its attorneys to actively participate in bar associations and community based organizations. The firm donates a portion of its earnings to various Houston nonprofit organizations and has funded scholarships for numerous individuals attending local schools.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Lawyers Clearinghouse

7 Winthrop Sq, Boston, Massachusetts, 02110, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

The Lawyers Clearinghouse was founded in 1988 by the Boston Bar Association and Massachusetts Bar Association. The organization grew out of a common belief that the pro bono resources of the private bar could be organized and coordinated to fight homelessness and the lack of affordable housing in the Greater Boston area. Over thirty years later, even as we have expanded the scope of our services, this belief remains our central model in assisting approximately 250 homeless and low-income clients and 500 nonprofit organizations each year. Our programs include the Massachusetts Legal Clinic for the Homeless & Low-Income Residents, which provides full representation legal services to the homeless and very low-income individuals on a variety of basic subsistence needs issues including securing subsidized housing, applying for disability and SSI benefits, resolving immigration problems, and sealing criminal records; the Nonprofit Assistance Program, which matches volunteer lawyers with nonprofit organizations in need of legal assistance; and the Access to Justice Fellows Program, which pairs retired lawyers and judges with legal services offices and nonprofit organizations for one year fellowships. Low-income, very low-income, and homeless people in Boston are all people the Clearinghouse serves through our Legal Clinic and Nonprofit Assistance Program. The Legal Clinic is designed to reduce barriers to self-sufficiency endured by homeless and low-income individuals by providing direct, free, one-on-one legal assistance. We are the only organization providing no-cost legal services to non-Veteran homeless individuals in Boston and we are the only statewide organization that provides pro bono legal services to nonprofit organizations. The Clearinghouse is governed by a 23 member board and has 4 full-time and 1 part-time (4.5 FTE) staff members. Our small staff recruit, train, coordinate, and mentor hundreds of volunteers each year.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lam-lyn-&-philip-p.c..jpeg
Lam, Lyn & Philip, P.C.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-lawyers-clearinghouse.jpeg
Lawyers Clearinghouse
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lam, Lyn & Philip, P.C.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lawyers Clearinghouse
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lam, Lyn & Philip, P.C. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lawyers Clearinghouse in 2025.

Incident History — Lam, Lyn & Philip, P.C. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lam, Lyn & Philip, P.C. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lawyers Clearinghouse (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lawyers Clearinghouse cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lam-lyn-&-philip-p.c..jpeg
Lam, Lyn & Philip, P.C.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-lawyers-clearinghouse.jpeg
Lawyers Clearinghouse
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lam, Lyn & Philip, P.C. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Lawyers Clearinghouse company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Lawyers Clearinghouse company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lam, Lyn & Philip, P.C. company.

In the current year, Lawyers Clearinghouse company and Lam, Lyn & Philip, P.C. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lawyers Clearinghouse company nor Lam, Lyn & Philip, P.C. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lawyers Clearinghouse company nor Lam, Lyn & Philip, P.C. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lawyers Clearinghouse company nor Lam, Lyn & Philip, P.C. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lam, Lyn & Philip, P.C. company nor Lawyers Clearinghouse company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lam, Lyn & Philip, P.C. nor Lawyers Clearinghouse holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Lam, Lyn & Philip, P.C. company nor Lawyers Clearinghouse company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lawyers Clearinghouse company employs more people globally than Lam, Lyn & Philip, P.C. company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Lam, Lyn & Philip, P.C. nor Lawyers Clearinghouse holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lam, Lyn & Philip, P.C. nor Lawyers Clearinghouse holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lam, Lyn & Philip, P.C. nor Lawyers Clearinghouse holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lam, Lyn & Philip, P.C. nor Lawyers Clearinghouse holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lam, Lyn & Philip, P.C. nor Lawyers Clearinghouse holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lam, Lyn & Philip, P.C. nor Lawyers Clearinghouse holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X