Comparison Overview

Lakeshore Museum Center

VS

Sharlot Hall Museum

Lakeshore Museum Center

430 W CLAY AVE, Muskegon, Michigan 49440, US
Last Update: 2026-01-19
Between 750 and 799

The Lakeshore Museum Center houses our natural and cultural history exhibits. It is comprised of multiple sites and buildings including the Muskegon Museum of History & Science, the Hackley & Hume Historic Site, the Fire Barn Museum, the Scolnik House of the Depression Era, the Muskegon Heritage Museum of Business & Industry, the Muskegon County Archive & Collection, and our Museum Store. Our mission is to tell the story of Muskegon County by collecting, preserving, and interpreting the history of its people and natural environment

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Sharlot Hall Museum

415 W. Gurley Street, Prescott, Arizona, 86301, US
Last Update: 2026-01-20

The Sharlot Hall Museum, founded in 1928 by visionary Sharlot M. Hall, is an open-air museum in downtown Prescott, Arizona. The four-acre campus includes several historic buildings, including the 1864 Territorial Governor's Mansion, as well as expansive exhibits and gardens. Regular events and programs include the annual Prescott Indian Art Market, premier winetasting event Sharlot's WineFest, monthly Living History Adventures, a popular lecture series, and more.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lakeshore-museum-center.jpeg
Lakeshore Museum Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sharlot-hall-museum.jpeg
Sharlot Hall Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lakeshore Museum Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sharlot Hall Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lakeshore Museum Center in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sharlot Hall Museum in 2026.

Incident History — Lakeshore Museum Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lakeshore Museum Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sharlot Hall Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sharlot Hall Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lakeshore-museum-center.jpeg
Lakeshore Museum Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sharlot-hall-museum.jpeg
Sharlot Hall Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lakeshore Museum Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sharlot Hall Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Sharlot Hall Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lakeshore Museum Center company.

In the current year, Sharlot Hall Museum company and Lakeshore Museum Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sharlot Hall Museum company nor Lakeshore Museum Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Sharlot Hall Museum company nor Lakeshore Museum Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sharlot Hall Museum company nor Lakeshore Museum Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lakeshore Museum Center company nor Sharlot Hall Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lakeshore Museum Center nor Sharlot Hall Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Lakeshore Museum Center company nor Sharlot Hall Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Both Lakeshore Museum Center company and Sharlot Hall Museum company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither Lakeshore Museum Center nor Sharlot Hall Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lakeshore Museum Center nor Sharlot Hall Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lakeshore Museum Center nor Sharlot Hall Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lakeshore Museum Center nor Sharlot Hall Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lakeshore Museum Center nor Sharlot Hall Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lakeshore Museum Center nor Sharlot Hall Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H