Comparison Overview

Lakeland Arts

VS

Louisiana State Museum

Lakeland Arts

Windermere, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-01
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://lakelandarts.org.uk/

Lakeland Arts has a unique role reflecting the creative inspiration that flows through the local landscape and its people. We are a charitable organisation and run four cultural destinations firmly embedded in the Lake District; Windermere Jetty Museum, Blackwell - the Arts and Crafts house, Abbot Hall and Lakeland Museum.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 43
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Louisiana State Museum

751 Chartres Street, New Orleans, LA, 70116, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799
http://louisianastatemuseum.org

The Louisiana State Museum is a statewide network of National Historic Landmarks and architecturally significant structures that house half a million artifacts that showcase Louisiana’s history and culture. Five of LSM’s museums call New Orleans’ historic French Quarter home. They include The Cabildo (1799) and The Presbytère (1813), which both flank the St. Louis Cathedral; the 1850 House, located in the Lower Pontalba building; Madame John’s Legacy (1788), one of the oldest examples of French Creole architecture in the French Quarter; and the Old U.S. Mint (1838), which holds the distinction of being the only Mint to produce coinage for two separate nations. The Capitol Park Museum graces the mall of Louisiana’s State Capitol in Baton Rouge and features thematic exhibits on diverse aspects of Louisiana history, industry and culture. The Louisiana Sports Hall of Fame and Northwest History Museum is an architectural masterpiece located on the banks of north Louisiana’s Cane River. The Wedell-Williams Aviation and Cypress Sawmill Museum and E.D. White Historic Site draw you into the beautiful environs of rural south Louisiana. All LSM museums are accredited by the American Alliance of Museums with the exception of the just-completed Louisiana Sports Hall of Fame and Northwest History Museum.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 65
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lakeland-arts.jpeg
Lakeland Arts
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/louisiana-state-museum.jpeg
Louisiana State Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lakeland Arts
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Louisiana State Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lakeland Arts in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Louisiana State Museum in 2025.

Incident History — Lakeland Arts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lakeland Arts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Louisiana State Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Louisiana State Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lakeland-arts.jpeg
Lakeland Arts
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/louisiana-state-museum.jpeg
Louisiana State Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Lakeland Arts company and Louisiana State Museum company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Louisiana State Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lakeland Arts company.

In the current year, Louisiana State Museum company and Lakeland Arts company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Louisiana State Museum company nor Lakeland Arts company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Louisiana State Museum company nor Lakeland Arts company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Louisiana State Museum company nor Lakeland Arts company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lakeland Arts company nor Louisiana State Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lakeland Arts nor Louisiana State Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Lakeland Arts company nor Louisiana State Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Louisiana State Museum company employs more people globally than Lakeland Arts company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Lakeland Arts nor Louisiana State Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lakeland Arts nor Louisiana State Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lakeland Arts nor Louisiana State Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lakeland Arts nor Louisiana State Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lakeland Arts nor Louisiana State Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lakeland Arts nor Louisiana State Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References