Comparison Overview

Lake Printing & Design

VS

Vintage 99 Label Mfg, Inc.

Lake Printing & Design

5015 W. WT Harris Blvd, Charlotte, NC - North Carolina, 28269, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Lake Printing & Design is a family owned and operated print services company. We specialize in commercial offset & digital printing, fulfillment and online storefront services. Our expertise is consulting and partnering with businesses to help market and advertise their brand through print On Demand Print Digital Printing Offset Printing Wide Format Printing Mailing Signs & Banners Apparel Promotional & Specialty Products Fulfillment Custom Online Storefronts Give us a call at 704-895-3878 or drop us an e-mail at [email protected]. We look forward to establishing a mutually beneficial relationship with all of our future clients.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Vintage 99 Label Mfg, Inc.

611 Enterprise Ct, Livermore, California, 94550-5200, US
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 750 and 799

Vintage 99 Labels -- Printer of Fine Wine Labels for over 25 years. No one understands the critical importance of the wine label more than the dedicated staff of Vintage 99 Label. For us, producing a wine label is still a unique craft just like the process of winemaking itself. For over a decade the most skilled wineries in the industry have trusted Vintage 99 to tell their story and deliver the quality, service and value that an exceptional wine deserves. Turn to Vintage 99 for: - Unmatched lead-times of 10-15 days, not 4-6 weeks. - The latest Print Technology with high impact finishing options - Two locations : Livermore, CA and Santa Rosa, CA Please contact one of our label experts to experience our passion for the craft at 877-339-8899.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lake-printing-&-design.jpeg
Lake Printing & Design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vintage-99-label-mfg-corp.jpeg
Vintage 99 Label Mfg, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lake Printing & Design
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Vintage 99 Label Mfg, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lake Printing & Design in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Vintage 99 Label Mfg, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Lake Printing & Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lake Printing & Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Vintage 99 Label Mfg, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Vintage 99 Label Mfg, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lake-printing-&-design.jpeg
Lake Printing & Design
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vintage-99-label-mfg-corp.jpeg
Vintage 99 Label Mfg, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Lake Printing & Design company and Vintage 99 Label Mfg, Inc. company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Vintage 99 Label Mfg, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lake Printing & Design company.

In the current year, Vintage 99 Label Mfg, Inc. company and Lake Printing & Design company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Vintage 99 Label Mfg, Inc. company nor Lake Printing & Design company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Vintage 99 Label Mfg, Inc. company nor Lake Printing & Design company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Vintage 99 Label Mfg, Inc. company nor Lake Printing & Design company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lake Printing & Design company nor Vintage 99 Label Mfg, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lake Printing & Design nor Vintage 99 Label Mfg, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Vintage 99 Label Mfg, Inc. company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Lake Printing & Design company.

Vintage 99 Label Mfg, Inc. company employs more people globally than Lake Printing & Design company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Lake Printing & Design nor Vintage 99 Label Mfg, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lake Printing & Design nor Vintage 99 Label Mfg, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lake Printing & Design nor Vintage 99 Label Mfg, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lake Printing & Design nor Vintage 99 Label Mfg, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lake Printing & Design nor Vintage 99 Label Mfg, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lake Printing & Design nor Vintage 99 Label Mfg, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. Versions starting with 0.211.0 and prior to 1.120.4, 1.121.1, and 1.122.0 contain a critical Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability in their workflow expression evaluation system. Under certain conditions, expressions supplied by authenticated users during workflow configuration may be evaluated in an execution context that is not sufficiently isolated from the underlying runtime. An authenticated attacker could abuse this behavior to execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the n8n process. Successful exploitation may lead to full compromise of the affected instance, including unauthorized access to sensitive data, modification of workflows, and execution of system-level operations. This issue has been fixed in versions 1.120.4, 1.121.1, and 1.122.0. Users are strongly advised to upgrade to a patched version, which introduces additional safeguards to restrict expression evaluation. If upgrading is not immediately possible, administrators should consider the following temporary mitigations: Limit workflow creation and editing permissions to fully trusted users only; and/or deploy n8n in a hardened environment with restricted operating system privileges and network access to reduce the impact of potential exploitation. These workarounds do not fully eliminate the risk and should only be used as short-term measures.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

FastAPI Users allows users to quickly add a registration and authentication system to their FastAPI project. Prior to version 15.0.2, the OAuth login state tokens are completely stateless and carry no per-request entropy or any data that could link them to the session that initiated the OAuth flow. `generate_state_token()` is always called with an empty `state_data` dict, so the resulting JWT only contains the fixed audience claim plus an expiration timestamp. On callback, the library merely checks that the JWT verifies under `state_secret` and is unexpired; there is no attempt to match the state value to the browser that initiated the OAuth request, no correlation cookie, and no server-side cache. Any attacker can hit `/authorize`, capture the server-generated state, finish the upstream OAuth flow with their own provider account, and then trick a victim into loading `.../callback?code=<attacker_code>&state=<attacker_state>`. Because the state JWT is valid for any client for \~1 hour, the victim’s browser will complete the flow. This leads to login CSRF. Depending on the app’s logic, the login CSRF can lead to an account takeover of the victim account or to the victim user getting logged in to the attacker's account. Version 15.0.2 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

FileZilla Client 3.63.1 contains a DLL hijacking vulnerability that allows attackers to execute malicious code by placing a crafted TextShaping.dll in the application directory. Attackers can generate a reverse shell payload using msfvenom and replace the missing DLL to achieve remote code execution when the application launches.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

LDAP Tool Box Self Service Password 1.5.2 contains a password reset vulnerability that allows attackers to manipulate HTTP Host headers during token generation. Attackers can craft malicious password reset requests that generate tokens sent to a controlled server, enabling potential account takeover by intercepting and using stolen reset tokens.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Kimai 1.30.10 contains a SameSite cookie vulnerability that allows attackers to steal user session cookies through malicious exploitation. Attackers can trick victims into executing a crafted PHP script that captures and writes session cookie information to a file, enabling potential session hijacking.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X