Comparison Overview

Lake Erie Nature & Science Center

VS

Nauticus

Lake Erie Nature & Science Center

28728 Wolf Road, Bay Village, OH, 44140, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.lensc.org

The nonprofit Lake Erie Nature & Science Center educates and inspires each of us to understand, appreciate and take responsibility for our natural world. Since our founding in 1945, Lake Erie Nature & Science Center has connected people of all ages with the wonders of the natural world by providing free admission to indoor and outdoor exhibits, offering nature-based educational programming for all ages, operating one of two public access planetariums in Cuyahoga County and providing wildlife rehabilitation services at no charge to the public. The Center offers a distinct blend of early childhood programs, seasonal family events, school field trips, scout programs, summer camps and wildlife rehabilitation services. Lake Erie Nature & Science Center is funded by donations, program fees and grants including Cuyahoga Arts & Culture through the residents of Cuyahoga County. 501(c)(c) nonprofit organization Tax ID: #34-0845030

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 31
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Nauticus

1 Waterside Dr, None, Norfolk, Virginia, US, 23510
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
https://nauticus.org/

Nauticus is a maritime discovery center located along the waterfront in downtown, Norfolk offering a unique form of experiential learning for all ages. Through interactive exhibits and STEM to STERN programming, Nauticus uses the museum, Battleship Wisconsin, sailing center, and Schooner Virginia to tell the story of the maritime environment, industry, and the military.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 66
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lake-erie-nature-&-science-center.jpeg
Lake Erie Nature & Science Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nauticus-foundation.jpeg
Nauticus
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lake Erie Nature & Science Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Nauticus
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lake Erie Nature & Science Center in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nauticus in 2026.

Incident History — Lake Erie Nature & Science Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lake Erie Nature & Science Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Nauticus (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nauticus cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lake-erie-nature-&-science-center.jpeg
Lake Erie Nature & Science Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nauticus-foundation.jpeg
Nauticus
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Nauticus company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Lake Erie Nature & Science Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Nauticus company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lake Erie Nature & Science Center company.

In the current year, Nauticus company and Lake Erie Nature & Science Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Nauticus company nor Lake Erie Nature & Science Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Nauticus company nor Lake Erie Nature & Science Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Nauticus company nor Lake Erie Nature & Science Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lake Erie Nature & Science Center company nor Nauticus company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lake Erie Nature & Science Center nor Nauticus holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Lake Erie Nature & Science Center company nor Nauticus company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Nauticus company employs more people globally than Lake Erie Nature & Science Center company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Lake Erie Nature & Science Center nor Nauticus holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lake Erie Nature & Science Center nor Nauticus holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lake Erie Nature & Science Center nor Nauticus holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lake Erie Nature & Science Center nor Nauticus holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lake Erie Nature & Science Center nor Nauticus holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lake Erie Nature & Science Center nor Nauticus holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References