Comparison Overview

Lake City Printing

VS

Fujikura Graphics, Inc.

Lake City Printing

1723 W Sale Rd, Lake Charles, Louisiana, US, 70605
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.lcpmail.com

Lake City Printing was started in 1977 by Peter Romero. Today LCP utilizes the latest digital equipment along with sheet feed presses and wide format printers. We are proud to use such brands as Kodak, Roland, Screen, Heidelberg, MBO, Polar, and Duplo. Our state-of-the-art equipment allows us to provide our clients with high-quality products faster and less-expensively than our competition. LCP is located in Lake Charles, LA and serves the state of Louisiana and east Texas region. We provide the business community with the following services: ►Printing ►Direct Mail ►Promotional Items ►Graphic Design ►Email Marketing

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 20
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Fujikura Graphics, Inc.

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
http://www.fujikuragraphics.com

With more than a half century of history in the manufacturing of offset printing blankets, and striving to create the best and most ecological product for mankind, Fujikura Rubber, Ltd. continues to develop and produce unique products by utilizing the composite technology based on original rubberized fabric production techniques, consistent with our rigorous R&D standards. Especially the field of graphical arts, with expanding global sales strategy, we continue to gain numerous numbers of customers world wide. Requirements from our closest and best relationships with our customer are incorporated into the specifications for new development. To realize those new demands, we are continually exploring the best components towards the next design. In 1999, Fujikura retooled and enhanced the quality management system approved by ISO9001. We assure not only quality, but also reliance and security. FUJIKURA GRAPHICS offers the product which can contribute to society, and also be a better partner ecologically, and globally.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lake-city-printing.jpeg
Lake City Printing
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fujikura-graphics-inc-.jpeg
Fujikura Graphics, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lake City Printing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fujikura Graphics, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lake City Printing in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fujikura Graphics, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Lake City Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lake City Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fujikura Graphics, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fujikura Graphics, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lake-city-printing.jpeg
Lake City Printing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fujikura-graphics-inc-.jpeg
Fujikura Graphics, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Fujikura Graphics, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Lake City Printing company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Fujikura Graphics, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lake City Printing company.

In the current year, Fujikura Graphics, Inc. company and Lake City Printing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fujikura Graphics, Inc. company nor Lake City Printing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Fujikura Graphics, Inc. company nor Lake City Printing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Fujikura Graphics, Inc. company nor Lake City Printing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lake City Printing company nor Fujikura Graphics, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lake City Printing nor Fujikura Graphics, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Lake City Printing company nor Fujikura Graphics, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lake City Printing company employs more people globally than Fujikura Graphics, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Lake City Printing nor Fujikura Graphics, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lake City Printing nor Fujikura Graphics, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lake City Printing nor Fujikura Graphics, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lake City Printing nor Fujikura Graphics, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lake City Printing nor Fujikura Graphics, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lake City Printing nor Fujikura Graphics, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References