Comparison Overview

Lahai Health

VS

HumanCapitalCare

Lahai Health

19820 Scriber Lake Rd, Lynnwood, WA, US, 98036
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

Lahai Health is a free clinic providing health care to King and Snohomish counties. We serve low-income, uninsured, and underserved families and individuals by providing integrated and comprehensive medical, dental, and professional counseling services. Our mission is providing quality and compassionate health care to the underserved showing Christ’s love to everyone. We have fixed sites in Lynnwood and North Seattle. We have also expanded to other communities by way of our Mobile Medical Clinic, "Hope"​, where we are able to partner with local churches/organizations to bring care directly to those who need it most.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 69
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

HumanCapitalCare

Science Park Eindhoven 5127, Son, Noord-Brabant, NL, 5692 ED
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Samen werken aan gezondheid. Vanuit deze gedachte adviseert en ondersteunt HumanCapitalCare organisaties bij een positieve en op gezondheid gerichte aanpak van werk en arbeidsomstandigheden. Het doel hierbij is het verhogen van productiviteit, kwaliteit en resultaat door het creëren van optimale arbeidsomstandigheden en het beschikken over competente, gemotiveerde en gezonde medewerkers. Hiermee leggen we de basis voor het toekomstige succes van onze klanten.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 359
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lahai.org.jpeg
Lahai Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/humancapitalcare.jpeg
HumanCapitalCare
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lahai Health
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
HumanCapitalCare
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lahai Health in 2025.

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HumanCapitalCare in 2025.

Incident History — Lahai Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lahai Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — HumanCapitalCare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HumanCapitalCare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lahai.org.jpeg
Lahai Health
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/humancapitalcare.jpeg
HumanCapitalCare
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Lahai Health company and HumanCapitalCare company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, HumanCapitalCare company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lahai Health company.

In the current year, HumanCapitalCare company and Lahai Health company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither HumanCapitalCare company nor Lahai Health company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither HumanCapitalCare company nor Lahai Health company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither HumanCapitalCare company nor Lahai Health company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lahai Health company nor HumanCapitalCare company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lahai Health nor HumanCapitalCare holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Lahai Health company nor HumanCapitalCare company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

HumanCapitalCare company employs more people globally than Lahai Health company, reflecting its scale as a Health and Human Services.

Neither Lahai Health nor HumanCapitalCare holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lahai Health nor HumanCapitalCare holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lahai Health nor HumanCapitalCare holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lahai Health nor HumanCapitalCare holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lahai Health nor HumanCapitalCare holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lahai Health nor HumanCapitalCare holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H