Comparison Overview

Ladbrokes Coral

VS

Gamestec

Ladbrokes Coral

Westfield Stratford City,, Montfichet Road,, London, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-24

Ladbrokes Coral provides customers with exciting, simple and responsible betting and gaming experiences, delivered by the most passionate and committed people in the industry. Our origins lie in the traditional business of providing betting services to generations of British customers on horse and greyhound racing. Today, we've got the biggest UK high street presence in the industry, a growing online business and leading positions in some of the world's best markets internationally. Our recent acquisition by GVC has opened up unrivaled opportunities for further growth and success. As one of the largest betting and gaming companies, and a member of the FTSE 100 index, we aim to meet the highest standards in everything we do, from the way we run our business, to how we support our people, our customers and the communities we work in. With the best betting and gaming brands and the best people, we aim to lead the field and shape the future of responsible gambling. Want to join us on our journey? There couldn't be a better time.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 4,509
Subsidiaries: 13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Gamestec

None
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Gamestec Leisure Limited is one of the largest and most progressive suppliers of coin operated amusement equipments throughout the UK and part of the Novomatic group, a world leader in gaming solutions and supply. We operate in a range of public venues, ranging from Public Houses, Licensed Betting Offices, Clubs, Family Entertainment Centres, Bowling Alleys and Holiday Parks. Our business is about providing class leading pay to play entertainment to the licensed and leisure sector and we pride ourselves on being able to deliver exceptional service to a wide range of customers.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 142
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ladbrokescoralcareers.jpeg
Ladbrokes Coral
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gamestec.jpeg
Gamestec
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ladbrokes Coral
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Gamestec
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ladbrokes Coral in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gamestec in 2025.

Incident History — Ladbrokes Coral (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ladbrokes Coral cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Gamestec (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gamestec cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ladbrokescoralcareers.jpeg
Ladbrokes Coral
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2017
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Hacking
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gamestec.jpeg
Gamestec
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Gamestec company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ladbrokes Coral company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Ladbrokes Coral company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Gamestec company has not reported any.

In the current year, Gamestec company and Ladbrokes Coral company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Gamestec company nor Ladbrokes Coral company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Gamestec company nor Ladbrokes Coral company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Gamestec company nor Ladbrokes Coral company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ladbrokes Coral company nor Gamestec company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ladbrokes Coral nor Gamestec holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Ladbrokes Coral company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Gamestec company.

Ladbrokes Coral company employs more people globally than Gamestec company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Ladbrokes Coral nor Gamestec holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ladbrokes Coral nor Gamestec holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ladbrokes Coral nor Gamestec holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ladbrokes Coral nor Gamestec holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ladbrokes Coral nor Gamestec holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ladbrokes Coral nor Gamestec holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H