Comparison Overview

Labyrinth Learning

VS

National Geographic Partners

Labyrinth Learning

Labyrinth Learning, Berkeley, CA, 94710, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.lablearning.com

Labyrinth Learning publishes a wide range of books and e-learning tools for community colleges, technical schools and community education programs. A revolutionary approach to instructional design makes it easier for readers and instructors to achieve specific educational goals, while efficient production makes Labyrinth materials highly affordable. Labyrinth supports its publications with a full range of instructor and student support materials. For more information, visit www.lablearning.com.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

National Geographic Partners

1145 17th St NW, Washington, 20036, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799
https://nationalgeographicpartners.com/

National Geographic Partners is a joint venture between The Walt Disney Company and the National Geographic Society. We return 27% of our proceeds to the nonprofit Society to fund work in the areas of science, exploration, conservation, and education. This unique partnership creates a virtuous cycle of storytelling and exploration that inspires people to act, enlightens their perspective, and often provides the spark to new ideas and innovation.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 78
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/labyrinth-learning.jpeg
Labyrinth Learning
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-geographic-partners.jpeg
National Geographic Partners
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Labyrinth Learning
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
National Geographic Partners
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Labyrinth Learning in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Geographic Partners in 2025.

Incident History — Labyrinth Learning (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Labyrinth Learning cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — National Geographic Partners (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Geographic Partners cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/labyrinth-learning.jpeg
Labyrinth Learning
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-geographic-partners.jpeg
National Geographic Partners
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

National Geographic Partners company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Labyrinth Learning company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, National Geographic Partners company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Labyrinth Learning company.

In the current year, National Geographic Partners company and Labyrinth Learning company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither National Geographic Partners company nor Labyrinth Learning company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither National Geographic Partners company nor Labyrinth Learning company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither National Geographic Partners company nor Labyrinth Learning company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Labyrinth Learning company nor National Geographic Partners company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Labyrinth Learning nor National Geographic Partners holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Labyrinth Learning company nor National Geographic Partners company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

National Geographic Partners company employs more people globally than Labyrinth Learning company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Labyrinth Learning nor National Geographic Partners holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Labyrinth Learning nor National Geographic Partners holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Labyrinth Learning nor National Geographic Partners holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Labyrinth Learning nor National Geographic Partners holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Labyrinth Learning nor National Geographic Partners holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Labyrinth Learning nor National Geographic Partners holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References