Comparison Overview

Labroots

VS

National Geographic

Labroots

18340 Yorba Linda Blvd., Yorba Linda, CA, 92886, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Labroots is the leading scientific social networking website, offering top scientific trending news and premier educational virtual events and webinars. Contributing to the advancement of science through content sharing capabilities, Labroots is a powerful advocate in amplifying global networks and communities. Founded in 2008, Labroots emphasizes digital innovation in scientific collaboration and learning. We have become a primary source for trending scientific news, webinars, virtual conferences and more. Offering more than articles and webcasts that go beyond the mundane and explore the latest discoveries in the world of science, Labroots users can stay atop their field by gaining continuing education credits from a wide range of topics through their participation in the webinars and virtual events. Join for free and become part of the largest scientific learning community in the world. In addition to the online portal, Labroots has recently launched a store section to sell science based apparel for all science lovers. From topics like Genetics and Biology, Labroots offers a large selection of shirts for men, women and children. No matter what kind of science you enjoy, Labroots has apparel everyone will love.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 47
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

National Geographic

1145 17th Street NW, Washington, DC, 20036-4688, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21

Since its inception more than 135 years ago, the core purpose of National Geographic has been to further the knowledge and awareness of our world. We are the world’s leading multimedia destination for the best stories in science, exploration and adventure. And our unrivaled sense of purpose and mission is best evidenced by the fact that nearly 30% of our profits go to funding real scientists, explorers, and conservationists. Official LinkedIn of National Geographic

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 8,465
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/labroots.jpeg
Labroots
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-geographic.jpeg
National Geographic
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Labroots
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
National Geographic
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Labroots in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Geographic in 2025.

Incident History — Labroots (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Labroots cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — National Geographic (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Geographic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/labroots.jpeg
Labroots
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-geographic.jpeg
National Geographic
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

National Geographic company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Labroots company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, National Geographic company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Labroots company.

In the current year, National Geographic company and Labroots company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither National Geographic company nor Labroots company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither National Geographic company nor Labroots company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither National Geographic company nor Labroots company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Labroots company nor National Geographic company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Labroots nor National Geographic holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

National Geographic company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Labroots company.

National Geographic company employs more people globally than Labroots company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Labroots nor National Geographic holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Labroots nor National Geographic holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Labroots nor National Geographic holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Labroots nor National Geographic holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Labroots nor National Geographic holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Labroots nor National Geographic holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.