Comparison Overview

Labor Law Center

VS

Doctorzed Publishing

Labor Law Center

1651 E Saint Andrew Pl, None, Santa Ana, California, US, 92705
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.laborlawcenter.com

We're an online provider of labor law postings and compliance materials to businesses, corporate resellers, and government institutions across the United States. For more than 15 years, we've helped thousands of businesses meet city, state, OSHA and federal labor law requirements with zero posting violations incurred against the businesses we protect. We offer the best online tools available to match businesses with the exact products needed for compliance and to maintain that compliance year-round. You can even work with our experienced professionals live to navigate you through the often complex compliance process to meet the specific needs of your organization.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Doctorzed Publishing

10 Vista Ave, Adelaide, SA, 5072, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799
http://www.doctorzed.com

Are you a conscious entrepreneur or business owner looking to tell your story and position yourself as an expert in the field? Then DoctorZed Publishing can help you tell your story and deliver it to your audience through our multi-media platform. We can create packages to suit your needs, from print books, ebooks, blogs, email newsletters, podcasts, webinars, and online courses. Call us today or visit www.doctorzed.com to learn more about how we can help you tell your story.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/laborlawcenter.jpeg
Labor Law Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/doctorzed-publishing.jpeg
Doctorzed Publishing
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Labor Law Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Doctorzed Publishing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Labor Law Center in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Doctorzed Publishing in 2025.

Incident History — Labor Law Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Labor Law Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Doctorzed Publishing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Doctorzed Publishing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/laborlawcenter.jpeg
Labor Law Center
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized code placed on the website
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/doctorzed-publishing.jpeg
Doctorzed Publishing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Doctorzed Publishing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Labor Law Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Labor Law Center company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Doctorzed Publishing company has not reported any.

In the current year, Doctorzed Publishing company and Labor Law Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Doctorzed Publishing company nor Labor Law Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Labor Law Center company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Doctorzed Publishing company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Doctorzed Publishing company nor Labor Law Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Labor Law Center company nor Doctorzed Publishing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Labor Law Center nor Doctorzed Publishing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Labor Law Center company nor Doctorzed Publishing company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Labor Law Center company employs more people globally than Doctorzed Publishing company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Labor Law Center nor Doctorzed Publishing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Labor Law Center nor Doctorzed Publishing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Labor Law Center nor Doctorzed Publishing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Labor Law Center nor Doctorzed Publishing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Labor Law Center nor Doctorzed Publishing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Labor Law Center nor Doctorzed Publishing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References