Comparison Overview

Laboratorul de Arta

VS

Opera Carolina

Laboratorul de Arta

None
Last Update: 2025-12-14
Between 750 and 799

Laboratorul de Artă este dedicat cercetării omenescului prin diverse forme de artă, precum actorie, mişcare, muzică, pictură ş.a. Cercetarea omenescului se sprijină pe o căutare autentică, din interior și își propune să exprime ființa umană în adevărul și vulnerabilitatea sa. Prin această iniţiativă, ne dorim să creăm o comunitate în care artişti profesionişti şi iubitori de artă să construiască împreună proiecte și inițiative pornind de la ceea ce descoperă din propriul proces de cercetare interioară. Misiunea Laboratorul de Arta este de a crea un mediu în care oamenii să se poată exprima autentic și liber prin diferite forme ale artei.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Opera Carolina

13006 Artisan Hill Drive, 301 S. Tryon Street; Suite 1550, Charlotte, NC, US, 28207
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1948 by the Charlotte Music Club, Opera Carolina is the largest Opera company in the Carolinas; annually serving more than 70,000 people in North Carolina and South Carolina (excluding broadcasts); reaching an average of seventeen counties in the Carolinas each year through its Education programs, and is a source of tourism to Charlotte for main stage productions at the North Carolina Blumenthal Performing Arts Center. Opera Carolina is an efficient organization with no accumulated debt, an Endowment fund of roughly $2.8mil, and an annual budget of $2.9 mil. The mission of Opera Carolina is to elevate the quality of life throughout the region's diverse communities through the presentation of excellent Opera and Education Programs. Opera Carolina is a member of OPERA America, Inc., and receives funds from the Arts & Science Council, and the North Carolina Arts Council.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 50
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/laboratorul-de-arta.jpeg
Laboratorul de Arta
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/opera-carolina.jpeg
Opera Carolina
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Laboratorul de Arta
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Opera Carolina
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Laboratorul de Arta in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Opera Carolina in 2025.

Incident History — Laboratorul de Arta (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Laboratorul de Arta cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Opera Carolina (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Opera Carolina cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/laboratorul-de-arta.jpeg
Laboratorul de Arta
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/opera-carolina.jpeg
Opera Carolina
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Laboratorul de Arta company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Opera Carolina company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Opera Carolina company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Laboratorul de Arta company.

In the current year, Opera Carolina company and Laboratorul de Arta company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Opera Carolina company nor Laboratorul de Arta company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Opera Carolina company nor Laboratorul de Arta company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Opera Carolina company nor Laboratorul de Arta company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Laboratorul de Arta company nor Opera Carolina company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Laboratorul de Arta nor Opera Carolina holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Laboratorul de Arta company nor Opera Carolina company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Opera Carolina company employs more people globally than Laboratorul de Arta company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither Laboratorul de Arta nor Opera Carolina holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Laboratorul de Arta nor Opera Carolina holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Laboratorul de Arta nor Opera Carolina holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Laboratorul de Arta nor Opera Carolina holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Laboratorul de Arta nor Opera Carolina holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Laboratorul de Arta nor Opera Carolina holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N