Comparison Overview

Labelmakers Group

VS

INPRNT

Labelmakers Group

55 Austrak Drive, Somerton, VIC, 3062, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-17

Australasia’s pre-eminent partner for printing and packaging solutions, supporting Australia’s most recognised and loved brands. Today the breadth of range spans wrap-labels, shrink sleeve, self-adhesive labels, wet glue labels, thermal labels, folding cartons and flexible packaging, supporting all brand development aspirations. Investment in vertical integration has given us total control over materials and manufacturing; which means we are nimble, able to respond quickly to trends and devote resources to printing innovation. We provide packaging of the following: • Self-Adhesive • Wet Glue • Thermal labels • Shrink Sleeves • Roll-Fed Poly Wrap • Digital Labels • IML Labels • Folding Cartons • Flexible Packaging • Printed Blister Foil Labelmakers has the largest range of label product capability in Australasia with a reputation for personal service excellence, consistent high-quality print and long-term partnerships. We are trusted to print labels for some of the world’s most well-known brands as well as work on highly confidential, niche brand development.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 176
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

INPRNT

Orlando, 32805, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

INPRNT was founded in 2006 as a service for artists, by artists. We handle all aspects of production in-house, which means we can produce the best quality prints available and provide the highest earnings to artists. We take care of the printing, packaging, shipping, and customer service so that your favorite artists never have to step away from creating the art you love.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/labemakers-group-pty-ltd.jpeg
Labelmakers Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/inprnt.jpeg
INPRNT
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Labelmakers Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
INPRNT
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Labelmakers Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for INPRNT in 2025.

Incident History — Labelmakers Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Labelmakers Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — INPRNT (X = Date, Y = Severity)

INPRNT cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/labemakers-group-pty-ltd.jpeg
Labelmakers Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/inprnt.jpeg
INPRNT
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Labelmakers Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to INPRNT company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, INPRNT company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Labelmakers Group company.

In the current year, INPRNT company and Labelmakers Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither INPRNT company nor Labelmakers Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither INPRNT company nor Labelmakers Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither INPRNT company nor Labelmakers Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Labelmakers Group company nor INPRNT company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Labelmakers Group nor INPRNT holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Labelmakers Group company nor INPRNT company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Labelmakers Group company employs more people globally than INPRNT company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Labelmakers Group nor INPRNT holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Labelmakers Group nor INPRNT holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Labelmakers Group nor INPRNT holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Labelmakers Group nor INPRNT holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Labelmakers Group nor INPRNT holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Labelmakers Group nor INPRNT holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N