Comparison Overview

Label World

VS

LandmarkPrint

Label World

29 Jet View Dr, Rochester, NY, 14624, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Custom printer of labels and flexible packaging for branding and security. * World class digital printing * Beyond prime labels--two ply labels, booklet labels and flexible packaging * Sustainability--L.I.F.E. certified and winner of TLMI Environmental Leadership Award for 2011 * Engaged workforce--winner of Best of the Best Workplaces in America by Printing Industries of America six years running. *cGMP compliant quality system

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 43
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

LandmarkPrint

375 Fairfield Avenue, Stamford, CT, 06902, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

LandmarkPrint provides integrated digital print production services, promotional signage, and displays to customers in New York, Connecticut, and New Jersey. We offer cost-effective solutions and innovative approaches to communicating your brand, products, and services. But just as important, we work to understand your business goals, the challenges you face, and anticipate your needs. We make it easier for you to do business. Our experienced team of professionals helps customers achieve maximum impact on a project-by-project basis through Digital Printing, Large Format Graphics & Displays, Personalized Direct Mail and Fulfillment Services, Online Ordering, and National Distribution. Our customers - nationally and internationally renowned marketers - attest to our value as problem-solvers, logjam-breakers, and creative thinkers. LandmarkPrint has been consistently ranked in the “Top 25” nationally for digital print production companies for almost 35 years. We are the largest print service provider in southern Fairfield County. Thank you for visiting our company page. We look forward to hearing from you!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 36
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/label-world.jpeg
Label World
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/landmark-print.jpeg
LandmarkPrint
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Label World
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
LandmarkPrint
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Label World in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LandmarkPrint in 2025.

Incident History — Label World (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Label World cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — LandmarkPrint (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LandmarkPrint cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/label-world.jpeg
Label World
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/landmark-print.jpeg
LandmarkPrint
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

LandmarkPrint company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Label World company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, LandmarkPrint company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Label World company.

In the current year, LandmarkPrint company and Label World company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither LandmarkPrint company nor Label World company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither LandmarkPrint company nor Label World company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither LandmarkPrint company nor Label World company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Label World company nor LandmarkPrint company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Label World nor LandmarkPrint holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Label World company nor LandmarkPrint company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Label World company employs more people globally than LandmarkPrint company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Label World nor LandmarkPrint holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Label World nor LandmarkPrint holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Label World nor LandmarkPrint holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Label World nor LandmarkPrint holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Label World nor LandmarkPrint holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Label World nor LandmarkPrint holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N