Comparison Overview

Label Works

VS

Fineline Printing Group

Label Works

2025 Lookout Drive, North Mankato, MN, 56003, US
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 750 and 799

Working with Label Works is just plain different than working with other label providers. When you choose to work with us you’ll get the best customer service experience in the industry….we’re Minnesota nice, meets label know-how. Plus you’ll get free targeted sales tools to help make selling labels easy….yep free! The majority of our products ship in just 24 hours…(and the rest of our stuff is pretty darn fast too). Label Works only uses state of the art printing equipment and has the most skilled operators in the industry which means top-notch label quality. As the exclusive provider of freeform (a laser cutting process), you no longer have to worry about size and shape restrictions. Hello label options! Give us a try and experience the Label Works difference! At Label Works, we’re the label experts so you don’t have to be! *Label Works has been in business since 1989 and is located in Mankato, Minnesota. Label Works is the label division for Taylor Corporation, a premier provider of powerful and intuitive products, services and expertise – this includes the interactive, printing and marketing solutions to more than half of the Fortune 500 companies and millions of small businesses and consumers around the world.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 68
Subsidiaries: 49
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Fineline Printing Group

8081 Zionsville Rd, Indianapolis, IN, 46268, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12

Fineline Printing Group is a leading minority certified commercial graphics and mailing provider in the Midwest. Fineline’s customers get the best in purchasing efficiencies and brand quality from our wide range of products and services and state-of-the-art equipment. Our knowledgeable account executives personally handle the details of every project and look for ways to make it better or more efficient. That’s why our motto is: we will not ask for your business until we can improve it. Started in 1981, Fineline now fills a 70,000 square foot facility in Indianapolis with 55 employees and state-of the-art production equipment. Fineline is a privately held, minority-owned business certified by numerous local, state, and regional agencies including the NMSDC. Fineline is SOC2 Type2 Certified, compliant to ISO 9001:2008 standards, HIPAA compliance, and G7 Master qualified.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 62
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/label-works.jpeg
Label Works
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fineline-printing-group.jpeg
Fineline Printing Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Label Works
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fineline Printing Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Label Works in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fineline Printing Group in 2025.

Incident History — Label Works (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Label Works cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fineline Printing Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fineline Printing Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/label-works.jpeg
Label Works
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2018
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fineline-printing-group.jpeg
Fineline Printing Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Label Works company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fineline Printing Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Label Works company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Fineline Printing Group company has not reported any.

In the current year, Fineline Printing Group company and Label Works company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fineline Printing Group company nor Label Works company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Label Works company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Fineline Printing Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Fineline Printing Group company nor Label Works company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Label Works company nor Fineline Printing Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Label Works nor Fineline Printing Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Label Works company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Fineline Printing Group company.

Label Works company employs more people globally than Fineline Printing Group company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Label Works nor Fineline Printing Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Label Works nor Fineline Printing Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Label Works nor Fineline Printing Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Label Works nor Fineline Printing Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Label Works nor Fineline Printing Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Label Works nor Fineline Printing Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N