Comparison Overview

Label Logic, inc.

VS

Holland Litho Printing Service

Label Logic, inc.

516 Pine Creek Ct, Elkhart, Indiana, 46516, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Label Logic, Inc. is a National provider of labels, tags and RFID, located in Elkhart, Indiana. Since our humble beginnings in a small garage in 1997, we have continuously grown. Today, we occupy a large production facility where we produce and provide labels, tags, RFID tags, printers, ribbons, and software to a variety of industries. Label Logic recently received recognition as the 2013 Elkhart Chamber of Commerce Business of the Year.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 39
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Holland Litho Printing Service

10972 Chicago Drive, Zeeland, MI 49464, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1957, HLPS has developed into a leading provider of superior print products and marketing materials. We stay on top of the latest trends and technologies, allowing us to better serve our clients and their changing needs. We're a full service offset/digital printing and direct mail company with supporting services such as the following: Color Correction - Retouching - Scanning - Mounting - Laminating Large Format Digital Output - Bindery - Finishing Variable Data Personalization - Fulfillment - Direct Mail - Web to Print Our professional sales associates and customer service staff are genuinely committed to serving you and your requirements. Our prepress, pressroom, bindery and direct mail specialists are patient and precise, insisting that projects meet quality standards. Each project at HLPS is monitored through an engineering group and a quality control checkpoint at several stages. Skillful and detailed workers, combined with the finest tools, deliver results which meet and exceed expectations. Three shifts enable us to accommodate most schedules and our delivery fleet is a favorite of many of our existing clients. HLPS is also an environmentally conscious company, continually looking for ways to reduce our overall footprint. We use recyclable and recycled paper, vegetablebased inks, and we recycle all of our paper and aluminum scrap.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 58
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/label-logic.jpeg
Label Logic, inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/holland-litho-&-printing-services.jpeg
Holland Litho Printing Service
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Label Logic, inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Holland Litho Printing Service
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Label Logic, inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Holland Litho Printing Service in 2025.

Incident History — Label Logic, inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Label Logic, inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Holland Litho Printing Service (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Holland Litho Printing Service cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/label-logic.jpeg
Label Logic, inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/holland-litho-&-printing-services.jpeg
Holland Litho Printing Service
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Label Logic, inc. company and Holland Litho Printing Service company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Holland Litho Printing Service company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Label Logic, inc. company.

In the current year, Holland Litho Printing Service company and Label Logic, inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Holland Litho Printing Service company nor Label Logic, inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Holland Litho Printing Service company nor Label Logic, inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Holland Litho Printing Service company nor Label Logic, inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Label Logic, inc. company nor Holland Litho Printing Service company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Label Logic, inc. nor Holland Litho Printing Service holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Label Logic, inc. company nor Holland Litho Printing Service company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Holland Litho Printing Service company employs more people globally than Label Logic, inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Label Logic, inc. nor Holland Litho Printing Service holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Label Logic, inc. nor Holland Litho Printing Service holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Label Logic, inc. nor Holland Litho Printing Service holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Label Logic, inc. nor Holland Litho Printing Service holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Label Logic, inc. nor Holland Litho Printing Service holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Label Logic, inc. nor Holland Litho Printing Service holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L