Comparison Overview

Labcorp

VS

R1 RCM

Labcorp

531 South Spring Street, Burlington, North Carolina, US, 27215
Last Update: 2025-12-19
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.labcorp.com

Clear and confident health care decisions begin with questions. At Labcorp, we’re constantly in pursuit of answers. As a global leader of innovative and comprehensive laboratory services, we help doctors, hospitals, pharmaceutical companies, researchers and patients make clear and confident decisions. We provide insights and advance science to improve health and improve lives through our unparalleled diagnostics and drug development laboratory capabilities. Our more than 60,000 employees serve clients in over 100 countries, worked on over 80% of the new drugs approved by the FDA in 2022 and performed more than 600 million tests for patients around the world. Learn more about Labcorp (NYSE: LH) at www.labcorp.com.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 40,562
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2
View Profile

R1 RCM

434 W Ascension Way, 6th Floor, Murray, Utah, US, 84123
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.r1rcm.com

R1 is the leader in healthcare revenue management, helping providers achieve new levels of performance through smart orchestration. A pioneer in the industry, R1 created the first Healthcare Revenue Operating System: a modular, intelligent platform that integrates automation, AI, and human expertise to strengthen the entire revenue cycle. With more than 20 years of experience, R1 partners with 1,000 providers, including 95 of the top 100 U.S. health systems, and handles over 270 million payer transactions annually. This scale provides unmatched operational insight to help healthcare organizations unlock greater long-term value. To learn more, visit: https://www.r1rcm.com.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 21,172
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/labcorp.jpeg
Labcorp
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/r1-rcm.jpeg
R1 RCM
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Labcorp
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
R1 RCM
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Labcorp in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for R1 RCM in 2025.

Incident History — Labcorp (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Labcorp cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — R1 RCM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

R1 RCM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/labcorp.jpeg
Labcorp
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2018
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 07/2018
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/r1-rcm.jpeg
R1 RCM
Incidents

Date Detected: 08/2020
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Labcorp company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to R1 RCM company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Labcorp company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to R1 RCM company.

In the current year, R1 RCM company and Labcorp company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Both R1 RCM company and Labcorp company have confirmed experiencing at least one ransomware attack.

Labcorp company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other R1 RCM company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither R1 RCM company nor Labcorp company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Labcorp company nor R1 RCM company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Labcorp nor R1 RCM holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Labcorp company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to R1 RCM company.

Labcorp company employs more people globally than R1 RCM company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Labcorp nor R1 RCM holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Labcorp nor R1 RCM holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Labcorp nor R1 RCM holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Labcorp nor R1 RCM holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Labcorp nor R1 RCM holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Labcorp nor R1 RCM holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Authorization (CWE-285) in Kibana can lead to privilege escalation (CAPEC-233) by allowing an authenticated user to bypass intended permission restrictions via a crafted HTTP request. This allows an attacker who lacks the live queries - read permission to successfully retrieve the list of live queries.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Weblate is a web based localization tool. In versions prior to 5.15.1, it was possible to overwrite Git configuration remotely and override some of its behavior. Version 5.15.1 fixes the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Elasticsearch can allow an authenticated user with snapshot restore privileges to cause Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130) of memory and a denial of service (DoS) via crafted HTTP request.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Kibana can allow a low-privileged authenticated user to cause Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130) of computing resources and a denial of service (DoS) of the Kibana process via a crafted HTTP request.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('Cross-site Scripting') (CWE-79) allows an unauthenticated user to embed a malicious script in content that will be served to web browsers causing cross-site scripting (XSS) (CAPEC-63) via a vulnerability a function handler in the Vega AST evaluator.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
References