Comparison Overview

L&T Finance

VS

Equifax

L&T Finance

Plot no. 177, CST Road, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400 098, IN
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

L&T Finance is one of the leading NBFCs offering a range of loans across Rural | Housing | Two-Wheeler | Personal & Business (SME) The company is promoted by Larsen and Toubro Ltd. (L&T), one of the largest conglomerates in India. LTF is publicly listed on both the exchanges of India - BSE & NSE and complies to the guidelines applicable to an NBFC- CIC. Headquartered in Mumbai, the company has been rated AAA, the highest credit rating for NBFCs by four leading rating agencies.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 15,839
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Equifax

P.O. Box 740241, None, Atlanta, GA, US, 30374
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 650 and 699

At Equifax (NYSE: EFX), we believe knowledge drives progress. As a global data, analytics, and technology company, we play an essential role in the global economy by helping financial institutions, companies, employers, and government agencies make critical decisions with greater confidence. Our unique blend of differentiated data, analytics, and cloud technology drives insights to power decisions to move people forward. Headquartered in Atlanta and supported by nearly 15,000 employees worldwide, Equifax operates or has investments in 24 countries in North America, Central and South America, Europe, and the Asia Pacific region. For more information, visit Equifax.com.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 17,772
Subsidiaries: 19
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/l&t-finance.jpeg
L&T Finance
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/equifax.jpeg
Equifax
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
L&T Finance
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Equifax
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for L&T Finance in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

Equifax has 20.48% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — L&T Finance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

L&T Finance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Equifax (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Equifax cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/l&t-finance.jpeg
L&T Finance
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/equifax.jpeg
Equifax
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Breach
Motivation: Financial Gain, Fraud
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 04/2018
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 03/2018
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog

FAQ

L&T Finance company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Equifax company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Equifax company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas L&T Finance company has not reported any.

In the current year, Equifax company has reported more cyber incidents than L&T Finance company.

Neither Equifax company nor L&T Finance company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Equifax company has disclosed at least one data breach, while L&T Finance company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Equifax company nor L&T Finance company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither L&T Finance company nor Equifax company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither L&T Finance nor Equifax holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Equifax company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to L&T Finance company.

Equifax company employs more people globally than L&T Finance company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither L&T Finance nor Equifax holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither L&T Finance nor Equifax holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither L&T Finance nor Equifax holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither L&T Finance nor Equifax holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither L&T Finance nor Equifax holds HIPAA certification.

Neither L&T Finance nor Equifax holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N