Comparison Overview

KYUSHU RAILWAY COMPANY

VS

Transnet Freight Rail

KYUSHU RAILWAY COMPANY

Fukuoka, Fukuoka, JP
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

None

NAICS: 484
NAICS Definition: Truck Transportation
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Transnet Freight Rail

15 Girton Road. Parktown , Johannesburg , Gauteng , ZA, 2193
Last Update: 2025-11-25

Transnet Freight Rail is the largest division of Transnet SOC Ltd. It is a world class heavy haul freight rail company that specialises in the transportation of freight. The company maintains an extensive rail network across South Africa that connects with other rail networks in the sub-Saharan region, with its rail infrastructure representing about 80% of Africa's total. The company is proud of its reputation for technological leadership beyond Africa as well as with-in Africa, where it is active in some 17 countries.

NAICS: 484
NAICS Definition: Truck Transportation
Employees: 10,813
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
KYUSHU RAILWAY COMPANY
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/transnet-freight-rail.jpeg
Transnet Freight Rail
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
KYUSHU RAILWAY COMPANY
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Transnet Freight Rail
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Truck Transportation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KYUSHU RAILWAY COMPANY in 2025.

Incidents vs Truck Transportation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Transnet Freight Rail in 2025.

Incident History — KYUSHU RAILWAY COMPANY (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KYUSHU RAILWAY COMPANY cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Transnet Freight Rail (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Transnet Freight Rail cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
KYUSHU RAILWAY COMPANY
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/transnet-freight-rail.jpeg
Transnet Freight Rail
Incidents

Date Detected: 07/2021
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2021
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: financial gain
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Transnet Freight Rail company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to KYUSHU RAILWAY COMPANY company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Transnet Freight Rail company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas KYUSHU RAILWAY COMPANY company has not reported any.

In the current year, Transnet Freight Rail company and KYUSHU RAILWAY COMPANY company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Transnet Freight Rail company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while KYUSHU RAILWAY COMPANY company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Transnet Freight Rail company nor KYUSHU RAILWAY COMPANY company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Transnet Freight Rail company nor KYUSHU RAILWAY COMPANY company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither KYUSHU RAILWAY COMPANY company nor Transnet Freight Rail company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither KYUSHU RAILWAY COMPANY nor Transnet Freight Rail holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Transnet Freight Rail company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to KYUSHU RAILWAY COMPANY company.

Transnet Freight Rail company employs more people globally than KYUSHU RAILWAY COMPANY company, reflecting its scale as a Truck Transportation.

Neither KYUSHU RAILWAY COMPANY nor Transnet Freight Rail holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither KYUSHU RAILWAY COMPANY nor Transnet Freight Rail holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither KYUSHU RAILWAY COMPANY nor Transnet Freight Rail holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither KYUSHU RAILWAY COMPANY nor Transnet Freight Rail holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither KYUSHU RAILWAY COMPANY nor Transnet Freight Rail holds HIPAA certification.

Neither KYUSHU RAILWAY COMPANY nor Transnet Freight Rail holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H